--- submitted to Bob Argyle, 2011 Sep 25 --- published in Webb Society double star circular no 20 http://www.webbdeepsky.com/dssc/dssc20.pdf Common Proper Motion Pairs and other Doubles Found in Spectral Surveys - 3. Lowell, Kuiper, Vyssotsky, and other low-mass pairs. Brian A. Skiff, Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff AZ 86001-4499, USA e-mail: bas@lowell.edu This report is the third in a series presenting doubles identified while preparing various spectral surveys in machine-readable form. The great majority of the stars were found while working over lists of nearby and large-proper-motion stars, including many within 25 parsecs, commonly taken as the outer radius of the `nearby' stars. A few more pairs come from miscellaneous sources specified in the notes. The companions to the large-motion stars include many newly-identified low-luminosity M dwarfs and white dwarfs. Several of these were identified previously by various workers, but no measures were made and thus not recorded in the WDS. My working methods in identifying the pairs were very much the same as described in the first paper of this series (Skiff 2011). The astrometric sources are also the same as outlined in the first two papers. Since many of the pairs in the present collection are quite faint, additional astrometric sources were used to derive the relative astrometry, some of which are unconventional. Those not described previously are outlined below. Additional sources, not involving all-sky catalogues, are used for individual cases, and are cited in the notes. CPC2 The Second Cape Photographic Catalogue (Zacharias et al 1999) is a photographic catalogue containing a quarter-million stars covering the entire southern hemisphere to a limiting magnitude of about 10.5. The plates were taken with a red-corrected 20cm f/10 astrograph; the mean epoch is about 1968. The original plate-scans were re-reduced against the Hipparcos catalogue. For fairly wide, bright pairs this yields relative astrometry at an intermediate epoch having scatter of only a few hundredths of an arcsecond, every bit as good as recent catalogues. FONAC A catalogue for the northern sky derived from photographic plates taken with the 40cm Kiev wide-field astrograph (Kislyuk et al 1999). The astrometric reductions were with respect to the ACT. The claimed errors are 0".2, but the differential astrometry suggests a somewhat larger value. Thus I do not show this data in every instance where it's available. SuperCOSMOS The Wide-Field Astronomy Unit at the Institute for Astronomy, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, scanned Schmidt survey plates for the entire sky with a pixel size of only 10 microns = 0".7, a finer pitch than the scans done at Space Telescope Science Institute or USNO-Flagstaff. The WFAU worked very hard to get both the astrometry and the photometry as accurate as possible. There is no stand-alone catalogue, but results for individual plates can be searched ({\tt http://www-wfau.roe.ac.uk/sss/obj.html}). Like the more commonly-used Schmidt-plate catalogues, it is suitable only for relatively wide pairs. In the table I specify which plate a particular measure is from, e.g. ``SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue" or similar. AKARI This was a Japanese spacecraft that made an all-sky survey in the mid- and far-infrared, similar to IRAS, but with sensitivity about 10 times fainter (Ishihara et al 2010). The telescope had an aperture of 68.5cm with an effective pixel size of about 10". The coordinates were derived essentially with respect to 2MASS. Although not intended as a precision astrometric catalogue, I was surprised to find the differential measures to be quite acceptable. I adopt a mean epoch of 2007.0 for these data. The data table, comprising some 700 lines of measures, should be mostly self-explanatory. The first column shows the WDS name already assigned to the pairs. A few lack this name, and are newly reported here. For these the names column shows a legitimate SIMBAD moniker. The coordinates are given to 0".1 precision, as is adopted in the WDS, and nearly always are specifically for the primary star at both epoch and equinox J2000. The column `s' following the position shows a single-letter code for the source of the position: b USNO-B1.0 L Lepine & Shara M 2MASS S Sloan DR7 T Tycho-2 U UCAC2 or UCAC3 These are not chosen at random, but are the `best' for any specific case. Unless they are problematic, the default is to adopt UCAC2 or Tycho-2 for brighter uncrowded stars, and 2MASS or Sloan for the fainter stars. Some of the fainter large-motion stars have positions drawn from USNO-B1.0 or the Lepine \& Shara (2005) proper-motion catalogue. The magnitudes are standard V magnitudes obtained from a variety of sources, starting with published photoelectric or CCD photometry; the Tycho-2 catalogue, and ASAS-3 and TASS MkIV databases, and others; if necessary, as a last resort, rough adjusted averages from the red and blue magnitudes in the Schmidt survey catalogues, and even eyeball estimates from the plate-scans. It is often the case that only the combined magnitude has actually been measured; component values were then obtained by adopting delta-magnitudes from (for instance) CMC14 or UCAC3. The magnitudes are rounded to 0.1-mag precision in any case, and to whole magnitudes for rough estimates. Spectral types are shown in the next two columns. The quality of these types ranges from excellent to poor. If only one entry is present, it is for the primary only or for the combined type of the pair, generally when the delta-magnitude < 1.0. Uncertain or estimated photometric types (not from spectra) are shown with a colon. The relative astrometry then follows in the familiar format, with the source of each observation at the end of each line. Sometimes I have taken differences between two catalogues, where one star is present in each catalogue, e.g. ``Tycho-2 minus UCAC2". A note is given for every entry at the bottom of the data table. These mainly provide a valid SIMBAD name for the primary, since nearly all come from some published paper or catalogue. Other relevant details are given about apparent motion, spectral types, and so on. Acknowledgements I appreciate the interest of Brian Mason (USNO) in these pairs, and hope I have not caused him too much trouble. As is obvious from the roster of astrometric sources, the work over many decades of the U. S. Naval Observatory in both Flagstaff and Washington DC is indispensable to this sort of data-trawling. Similarly {\it sine qua non} are the catalogue-query services maintained by the Centre de Donn\'ees astronomiques de Strasbourg. References Ardeberg, A., and Maurice, E., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 28}, 153, 1977 Atlee, D. W., and Gould, A., Astrophys. J., {\bf 664}, 53, 2007 Barklem, P. S., and 9 co-authors, Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 439}, 129, 2005 Beers, T. C., Wilhelm, R., Doinidis, S. P., and Mattson, C. J., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 103}, 433, 1996 Beers, T. C., and 22 co-authors, Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 168}, 128, 2007 van den Besselaar, E. J. M., Roelofs, G. H. A., Nelemans, G. A., Augensteijn, T., and Groot, P. J., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 434}, L13, 2005 Biller, B. A., and 13 co-authors, Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 173}, 143, 2007 Bonfini, P., Hatzidimitriou, D., Pietsch, W., and Reig, P., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 507}, 705, 2009 Camargo, J. I. B., Ducourant, C., Teixeira, R., Le Campion, J.-F., Rapaport, M., and Benevides-Soares, P., Astron. Astrophys. {\bf 409}, 361, 2003 Christlieb, N., and 17 co-authors, Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 428}, 1027, 2004 Christlieb, N., Schoerck, T., Frebel, A., Beers, T. C., Wisotski, L., and Reimers, D., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 484}, 721, 2008 Clari\'a, J. J., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 9}, 251, 1973 Eggen, O. J., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 30}, 351, 1976 Farihi, J., Astrophys. J., {\bf 610}, 1013, 2004 Farihi, J., Becklin, E. E., and Zuckerman, B., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 161}, 394, 2005 Farihi, J., Hoard, D. W., and Wachter, S., Astrophys. J., {\bf 646}, 480, 2006 Farnsworth, A. H., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 2}, 123, 1955 Garcia, B., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 87}, 197, 1993 Giclas, H. L., Burnham, R., and Thomas, N. G., Lowell Obs. Bull., {\bf 8}, 157, 1980 Gliese, W., and Jarhei\ss, H., {\it Preliminary Version of the Third Catalogue of Nearby Stars}, Astron. Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg, 1991; available only on-line: {\tt http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?V/70A} Gray, R. O., and 7 co-authors, Astron. J., {\bf 132}, 161, 2006 Heber, U., Moehler, S., Napiwotzki, R., Thejll, P., and Green, E. M., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 383}, 938, 2002 Herbig, G. H., and Kuhi, L. V., Astrophys. J., {\bf 137}, 398, 1963 Houk, N., {\it Michigan Catalogue of Two-Dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars}, vol 2, 1978 Ishihara, D., and 32 co-authors, Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 514}, A1, 2010 Kislyuk, V., Yatsenko, A., Ivanov, G., Pakuliak, L., and Sergeeva T., {\it The FON Astrographic Catalogue}, Version 1.0, Main Astronomical Observatory of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 1999; see: {\tt http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?I/261} Lasker, B. M., and Sturch, C. R., and 14 co-authors, Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 68}, 1, 1988 Lee, O. J., Gore, G. D., and Baldwin, T. J., {\it Dearborn Catalogue of Faint Red Stars}, Ann. Dearborn Obs., {\bf 5}, part 1C, 1947 Lee, S.-G., Astron. J., {\bf 89}, 702, 1984 Lepine, S., and Shara, M. M., Astron. J. {\bf 129}, 1483, 2005 Liske J., Lemon, D. J., Driver, S. P., Cross, N. J. G., and Couch, W. J., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 344}, 307, 2003 Loden, L. O., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 29}, 31, 1977 Luyten, W. J., {\it Bruce Proper Motion Survey}. The General Catalogue, vol. I, II, 1963 McMahon, R. G., Irwin, M. J., and Maddox, S. J., {\it The APM-North Catalogue}, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge UK, 2000; VizieR file description at: {\tt http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?I/267} MacConnell, D. J., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 44}, 387, 1981 MacConnell, D. J., {\it IRAS Point Sources of flux at 12 microns greater than flux at 25 microns and falling within about 7 degrees of the Galactic Plane}, 1993; unpublished file available only on-line: {\tt http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?III/170B} Mason, K. O., and 27 co-authors, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 311}, 456, 2000 Ofek E. O., and 15 co-authors, Astrophys. J., {\bf 681}, 1464, 2008 Pigulski, A., Kopacki, G., and Ko\laczkowski, Z., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 376}, 144, 2001 Putney, A., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 112}, 527, 1997 Rastegaev, D. A., Balega, Yu. Yu., and Malogolovets, E. V., Astrophys. Bull., {\bf 62}, 235, 2007 Reed, B. C., and Thomas, C. G., J. R. Astron. Soc. Can., {\bf 86}, 248, 1992 Riaz, B., Gizis, J. E., and Harvin, J., Astron. J., {\bf 132}, 866, 2006 Robertson, T. H., and Jordan, T. M., Astron. J., {\bf 98}, 1354, 1989 R\"oser, S., Demleitner, M., and Schilbach, E., Astron. J. {\bf 139}, 2440, 2010 Ruiz, M. T., and Maza J., Astrophys. J., {\bf 335}, L15, 1988 Ruiz, M. T., and Maza J., Astron. J., {\bf 99}, 995, 1990 Sanduleak, N., and Pesch, P., Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 66}, 387, 1988 Shkolnik, E. L., Hebb, L., Liu, M. C., Reid, N. I., and Cameron, A. C., Astrophys. J., {\bf 716}, 1522, 2010 Skiff, B. A., Webb Society Double Star Section Circ., {\bf 19}, 14, 2011 Slawson, R. W., and Reed, B. C., Astron. J., {\bf 96}, 988, 1988 Stauffer, J., and 12 co-authors, Pub. Astron. Soc. Pac., {\bf 122}, 885, 2010 Stephenson, C. B., Astron. J., {\bf 91}, 144, 1986 Tachihara, K., Neuh\"auser, R., Kun, M., and Fukui, Y., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 437}, 2005 Tokovinin, A., Astron. J., {\bf 141}, 52, 2011 van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., and Hoffleit, E. D., {\it The General Catalogue of Trigonometric Stellar Parallaxes}, Fourth Edition, Yale University Observatory, 1995 Vyssotsky, A. N., Astron. J., {\bf 61}, 201, 1956 Wachter, S., and 5 co-authors, Astrophys. J., {\bf 586}, 1356, 2003 Warren, P. R., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 176}, 667, 1976 Wegner, G., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 165}, 271, 1973 Weis, E., Astron. J., {\bf 105}, 1962, 1993 Weistrop, D., Astron. J., {\bf 85}, 738, 1980 Westpfahl, D. J., Bell, D. J., and Yoss, K. M., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., {\bf 111}, 1169, 1999 Wroblewski, H., and Torres, C., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 115}, 481, 1996 Zacharias, N., Zacharias, M.I., and de Vegt, Chr., Astron. J. {\bf 117}, 2895, 1999 Zuckerman, B., and Becklin, E. E., Astrophys. J., {\bf 386}, 260, 1992 ******************************************************************************* WDS 00007-1216 = GR* 286 This is the first in RA order of a series of doubles found among red stars near the south galactic cap. The stars were listed as part of the Lowell proper-motion survey (Giclas et al 1980), and represent objects thought to be `very red' but below their nominal motion limit. Most of the stars are ordinary late-K and early-M dwarfs, and are not in fact especially red. This pair, although evident on various images, no relative astrometry is available from catalogues, so only estimates are shown for separation, position angle, and magnitudes. WDS 00100-0636 = G 158-35 + 138 These two stars were flagged as a possible wide (4') common-motion pair in the Lowell proper motion survey. The 50-year baseline of relative astrometry shown here confirms this. WDS 00132+0536 CD = DV Psc = StKM 2-12 The AB pair here is possibly optical. Lepine \& Shara (2005) found that the third brighter star directly involved here is a large-common-motion pair, now WDS 00132+0536 CD. The C component is itself a double-lined 0.3-day eclipsing binary, designated DV Psc. The UCAC2 measure for AC is given to make the identification certain along with the 2MASS observation of the closer pair. WDS 00178-1436 = BD-15 47 The companion here was not recognized by either Luyten or the Lowell observers. No spectral types are available, but the UBV colors for primary are consistent with an early-K dwarf. WDS 00244-2940 = G 267-95 This M-dwarf binary has been passing by an unrelated background star in recent decades. WDS 00319-1610 = GR* 11 The proper motion for this pair is significant, which makes the physical link certain. WDS 00321-0511 AB,E = HD 2880 This is the first of three very wide 7' pairs in the present list. It was mentioned in the notes to the Lowell proper motion survey. Giclas et al remark that their star G 158-97 ``may share common proper motion" with the close triple ADS 450 = G 158-98. From UCAC2 motions it appears this is indeed the case. The WDS shows unrelated component D at 113", but this more distant true companion seems to have been overlooked hitherto. WDS 00325-1753 = KUV 00300-1810 This Kiso ultraviolet survey binary appears to consist of two white dwarfs since both components are blue in the Sloan database. [primary type DA per SDSS DR8 spectrum] WDS 00341+2524 = StKM 2-40 = V493 And This close pair has significant common proper motion. Probably the brighter component is a spotted variable with a 3.2-day rotation period. WDS 00344+0009 = StKM 1-56 This large delta-mag pair comes from the Stephenson (1986) survey of K/M dwarfs. WDS 00361+2821 = StKM 2-42 A similar pair to StKM 2-40, but there is no SDSS coverage, so only a rough estimate from the 2MASS images can be made. WDS 00374-0714 = GD 706 The motion is small, but the separation and position-angle seem to be fixed over 50 years. 2MASS colors for the companion are consistent with an M dwarf, in which case the primary must be a cool degenerate. WDS 00376-1512 = G 268-14 The companion to this motion star was surprisingly overlooked by both Luyten and the Lowell observers, but finally picked up by Wroblewski \& Torres (1996). WDS 00391+7919 = TYC 4500-1549-1 The primary was identified by Tachihara et al (2005) as a T Tauri-type star with H-alpha emission. UCAC3 shows this to have a common-motion companion of later spectral type. WDS 00399-1051 = GR* 54 + 53 This was recognized as a common-motion pair by the Lowell observers (Norm Thomas and Robert Burnham, the latter of ``Celestial Handbook" fame), but not recorded in the WDS. WDS 00404+1825 = StKM 1-66 Another Stephenson K-dwarf binary showing little relative change since the POSS-I plates. Flo 135 = GSC 9141-0232 This non-WDS pair lies in the field of the Small Magellanic Cloud; its proper motion suggests it must be a foreground object. All the measures are uncertain: the AC2000 measure simply from being close, while the two modern observations are means of very discordant data. The UCAC3 measure is simply the (discordant) difference in Declination only. A few new observations are warranted. WDS 00429+2240 AB = G 69-14 This pair is readily noticeable on both DSS and 2MASS images, and consists of two early-M dwarfs at a distance of about 30pc according to the revised Hipparcos parallax. WDS 00429+2240 CD These two faint zero-motion stars near the motion pair G 69-14 have very similar colors, so are possibly a distant physical pair unrelated to the Lowell proper-motion pair. WDS 00450-0754 = BD-08 133 This K-dwarf binary is an Hipparcos star at about 50pc distance, so we get a `free' parallax for the companion as well. WDS 00457+4208 = [PFH2005] 663 This is a K-dwarf x-ray source projected near the Andromeda Galaxy. The small but significant proper-motion shows that this must be a foreground binary. The 2007 measure is from Ofek et al (2008), and although close to the correct orientation, might well result simply from the scatter in two observations. There has been no obvious change in relative position since the POSS-I plates (epoch 1953.7). WDS 00466+4129 = [PFH2005] 766 Another x-ray source near the Andromeda Galaxy; both components have spectral classifications from Bonfini et al (2009). WDS 00471+2700 = BD+26 122 = StKM 1-80 A Stephenson modest-motion K dwarf that has an easy-to-spot common-motion companion. UCAC3 has an erroneous motion for the companion, but the relative offset seems to be okay. WDS 00479-3254 = PS 2-31 This metal-poor blue star has a readily visible common-motion companion that is resolved in the 2MASS catalogue. WDS 00486-3317 = BPM 46644 This is one of several doubles reported by Olin Eggen (1976) that are not in the WDS. He presented UBVRI photometry for stars near the south galactic pole, and remarks on some pairs noticed visually at the telescope. Recovering this star, identified only by name, involved first finding its approximate coordinates in the printed Bruce Proper Motion catalogue (Luyten 1963), which luckily we have in the Lowell Observatory library. Then sky survey images of the field were examined to locate a pair matching Eggen's description, and finally the accurate position was queried in VizieR. WDS 00514+1844 = HD 4913 This nearby star (21pc) has a faint late-M dwarf co-moving companion. The estimate made from the POSS-I plate-scans suggests there has been little relative motion over a 45-year baseline. The pair is currently passing close to a background star about 20" southeast at present. WDS 00570-0542 = GR* 63 This pair is faint enough that it is resolved only in recent catalogues. There is no obvious relative motion from visual inspection since the POSS-I plates (epoch 1954.7). WDS 01037-2445 = GD 674 This star has a faint M dwarf companion that seems to have common proper motion. 2MASS barely detects the white dwarf, so that measure is discrepant. The primary has been incorrectly reported as a suspect quasar (Atlee \& Gould 2007). WDS 01076+4949 = BD+49 299 These two stars seem to share modest common that is distinct from the general field. The primary is evidently a K0 dwarf while the companion is an M dwarf. WDS 01083+2753 ABC = PG 0105+276 A common-motion pair involving a hot sdO subdwarf and two cooler companions. The companions were first recognized by Heber et al (2002). Unfortunately they give no position-angle, and since the HST images can be any orientation, it is difficult to recover that datum without digging up the source images. The more distant component is not visible on ordinary images, so I show only the separation given by Heber et al, plus an estimate of the position angle. WDS 01083-3535 = GD 683 The hot white dwarf was found to have a distant M dwarf candidate companion by Farihi et al (2005), confirmed here. Interestingly, the ROSAT x-ray detection is squarely on the white dwarf rather than the M dwarf, so there is other `interesting' stuff going on here. WDS 01155-3206 = [TS74] 366 Another M-dwarf binary near the south galactic pole. WDS 01176-0919 = G 270-185 This is a nice pair of M dwarfs resolved in the Sloan survey. WDS 01179-3454 = GR* 42 Peter Warren (1976) gives combined-light UBV photometry for this pair: V = 14.58, B-V = 1.52, U-B = 1.14, the low U-B value indicating unambiguously that these are early-M dwarfs. WDS 01183-1711 = GD 694 The proper motion here is very small, so the pair is not obviously physical. WDS 01262-2212 = BD-22 246 = StKM 1-156 This is a K dwarf identified by Stephenson (1986) as a single star. WDS 01278-1054 AC = HD 8921 The primary is a 1".5 binary first measured by S. W. Burnham. The distant M-dwarf companion GR* 123 lies about 3' west, and is nearly 9 magnitudes fainter. The proper motions are quite similar, but additional measurements would be useful to confirm the connection. WDS 01288-1723 = BD-18 238 = GR* 126 This pair of K and M dwarfs shows modest common motion in astrometric catalogues. WDS 01291-2410 = CD-24 638 The common-motion pair here are the eastern and southern stars of a trio; the third star about 30" northwest is optical. The UK Schmidt red survey plate has a guiding error that leads to a relatively poor position angle in the 1987.3 observation. WDS 01297-2630 = GD 13 This white-dwarf/M-dwarf (WD/DM) binary was first reported by Zuckerman \& Becklin (1992). Although rather faint in the visible, the late-M dwarf is the brighter star in the near-infrared. WDS 01300-0039 = G 271-77 + 76 This is mentioned as a common-proper-motion pair in the notes to the Lowell proper motion survey, which gives an approximate separation of 8" in pa 252\deg. No spectral type is available, but the 2MASS colors suggest a pair of late-K dwarfs. WDS 01301+6249 = LS I +62 164 I noticed this one as a result of the discrepancy between the spectral types in two catalogues. The primary is in the Case-Hamburg `Luminous Stars' survey of hot OB stars, while the companion is DO 24387 in the Dearborn red stars catalogue (Lee et al 1947). The OB star is taken as the primary, though they are about equally bright in the visible (the cool star dominates in the infrared). WDS 01327-1922 = GD 1088 The primary is what's called a PG 1159 star, i.e. an extremely hot pre-white-dwarf, which are sometimes associated with remnant planetary nebulae of very low surface brightness. Although sought, none has been detected here. The cool companion was noticed previously by Stehpanie Wachter et al (2003). The two measures are somewhat uncertain. WDS 01330-2128 = GR* 130 A close pair resolved only in the Sloan catalogue, but because of the southern Declination, the measure is rather poor. A faint third star presently about 5" south is unrelated. WDS 01340-0141 = BD-02 247 This is the second of the very wide 7' pairs noted here from the Lowell proper motion survey; the stars are named G 271-94 and G 271-99. The separation is given as 7'.2 in pa 22\deg. The measures here supplement the 2MASS observation in the WDS. WDS 01359-1326 = GR* 138 Only an estimate can be made for the separation and position angle of this close common-motion pair. WDS 01360-2330 = GR* 302 + 301 Another wide pair noted explicitly by Giclas et al. The available 20-year astrometric baseline confirms the common motion. WDS 01362-1302 = GR* 139 A similar object to WDS 01359-1326 above, and only an estimate can be made for the separation and position angle. WDS 01416+6100 = LF 5 +60 187 This star from the Case LF spectral survey (Farnsworth 1955) has a faint red companion that is visible on SDSS images. WDS 01433-0152 = GR* 112 The large common motion of this pair toward the southeast, about 0".2/year, makes the physical link clear. WDS 01438-3219 = GR* 317 The secondary here was probably a little too faint and too close to have been picked up on the Lowell `Pluto Camera' plates, but Luyten missed this one as well. WDS 01446-0112 = GR* 114 Luckily there is Sloan coverage for this pair, which provides an accurate recent measurement. The mid-infrared detection (IRAS Z01420-0127) and 2MASS color of J-K = 0.93 suggest these could be fairly late-type M dwarfs. WDS 01448-1732 = GR* 155 + 154 These were noted by Giclas et al as having common motion, verified by the measures shown here. WDS 01456+6108 AB = V973 Cas The primary is a Be star in the open cluster NGC 663, known for its many emission-line stars. Photometric data and astrometry for the individual stars is available from SDSS and from a paper by Pigulski et al (2001), which was obtained using a 60cm telescope and CCD. WDS 01456+6108 CD Only 10" southeast of V973 Cas in NGC 663 is another fainter `anonymous' pair with details available from the same sources. WDS 01459-0103 = G 271-B4 The Giclas designation comes from `appendix' stars in the Lowell proper motion survey, which lists pairs usually of contrasting color but whose motion was below their nominal cutoff of 0".27/year. In this case, the small-motion pair is sufficiently obscure as to lack an entry in SIMBAD. No spectra are available, but the Sloan and 2MASS colors suggest both stars are K dwarfs. WDS 01499+1056 = DO 306 This star was evidently recorded as red in the Dearborn catalogue, but is actually a G-type pair. WDS 01532+0911 = G 71-B5 The USNO-A2.0 measurement for this Lowell proper-motion `appendix' star comes from one of the earliest POSS-I plates. The LSPM measure clearly has the wrong position-angle, but is left in for completeness. The pair has been spectroscopically confirmed as an M-dwarf/white-dwarf pair (DM/WD), with the unevolved M dwarf being much brighter. The DZ star is thus a rather cool white dwarf. WDS 01576+0711 This pair lies in the field of the well-known white dwarf Feige 17, but is unrelated to it. The 2MASS J-K color suggests a pair of dwarfs near K0. The two stars are resolved in UCAC3, but the proper motions are erroneous. WDS 02009-1546 = G 272-B2 These have clear common proper motion from comparison of POSS-I and later images. The A2.0 separation is probably wrong due to photographic adjacency effects. The primary is taken to be the white dwarf since it is brighter in the visible, and in any case is the more evolved component. WDS 02047+7538 = GD 422 This one was catalogued as having common proper motion by Lepine \& Shara, and is another WD+DM binary. The primary was found to have large motion by Luyten, but somehow he overlooked the companion. WDS 02055-1431 = GR* 197 Another fairly close pair resolved nicely by the Sloan catalogue. WDS 02236+2228 = HD 14784 This Lowell binary comprises an ordinary G dwarf and a white dwarf companion. WDS 02480+5611 AB The original pair, Stein 1940, is optical, and the secondary is now being left behind as the primary moves eastward. Recent images, however, show a faint co-moving companion to A, for which only the 2MASS and Lepine \& Shara measurements are available from catalogues. The primary was classified as type K5 both in the old Dearborn red stars catalogue (Lee et al 1947) and forty years later by a different Lee (1984). WDS 02513+0128 = RJHA 3 Robertson \& Jordan (1989) found H-alpha emission in this star, which is not resolved in astrometric catalogues. It is a likely T Tauri system. WDS 02517-0816 = BD-08 535 The distant companion is catalogued as FBS 0249-084, a mid-M dwarf. Though the proper motion is small (about +30, -14 mas/year in RA,Dec respectively), the physical link is certain. WDS 03155+4029 = G 95-19 This Lowell proper-motion star is readily visible but not well resolved on various images except SDSS u, from which estimates are shown. WDS 03295+1248 = G 6-13 Another Lowell proper-motion star whose motion is smaller than their nominal limit. WDS 03342+7335 = BD+73 186 This is a northern slow-moving K+M dwarf binary (Vyssotsky 1956) associated with the x-ray source 1RXS J033415.2+733426. WDS 03417+0924 = G 79-56 Although easy to see on images, the companion was overlooked by Rastegaev et al (2007) using the 6-m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory, perhaps because of the large delta-mag. WDS 03435-1318 = GD 48 This is a fairly close WD+DM pair showing obvious common motion. 2MASS and DENIS show the position only of the red component, and the stars are not resolved in other catalogues. I show an estimate based on DSS2 plate scans. WDS 03492+5023 AC = BD+49 1032 The closer pair by Hussey has a distant companion of similar spectral type that shares common motion. It is bright enough to have several measures in the WDS besides the ones shown here, now spanning a 100-year baseline. WDS 04202+3336 = Far 4 = GD 60 This wide WD+DM binary was identified by Lepine \& Shara (2005) as well as by Jay Farihi et al (2005) in a search for low-luminosity companions to white dwarfs. WDS 04232+5008 = Putney 2 This pair was reported by Angela Putney (1997) in a paper concerning white dwarfs. She classified the brighter northwestern star as ``late-A or early-F". WDS 05008+1432 = Ross 384 The fainter star of this pair is not quite correctly resolved in the SDSS catalogue, so estimates are provided from images. Unfortunately, the epoch of the images seems to be different than the catalogue, so the epoch is uncertain. They are clearly a common-motion pair, so little relative change is expected. WDS 05034+0506 = G 84-33 This matched pair was recognized as binary by Stephenson (1986) and by Lepine \& Shara (2005), so it is not really new. The common proper motion is easy to see by comparing POSS-I against recent images. WDS 05078+0904 = HD 240917 I can't quite show from catalogue data alone that this is a common-motion pair, but it looks convincing from the near-identical star magnitudes/colors. WDS 05105+3139 = HD 241166 + HD 241165 Another wide pair from the HDE having slow motion but near-identical magnitudes and spectral types. The stars are bright enough that the astrometric history goes back to the Astrographic Catalogue. I show only a few indicative measures. WDS 05115+0527 = HD 241457 The motion here is small, so the link is presumed based on the small separation. WDS 05123+0317 = HD 241610 The common motion here is certain. A few additional astrometric measures are available but not shown; the five listed here are sufficient for the present purposes. WDS 05282+0258 = G 99-10 Reported by Lepine \& Shara as double. This is not an Hipparcos star, but is shown with parallax of 52 milliarcsec = 19pc distance in the Yale parallax catalogue (van Altena et al 1995), so this adds another `nearby' star to the census. WDS 05472+0000 = LkHA 313 + 312 This is a pair of T Tauri stars lying in the region of Messier 78 and its associated dark clouds. The two were first reported by Herbig \& Kuhi (1963); they have been rediscovered as an emission-line object (usually as a single star) several times since then. LkHA 312 is evidently the eastern star, and is sometimes the brighter one at visible wavelengths. Thus the position-angle could alternate between 290\deg and 110\deg. WDS 06040+3015 = Sh 2-241 1 The central star of the HII region Sh 2-241 is at least double. WDS 06201-2306 = HD 44291 The companion is SD-23 96 = CD-23 3720 = CPD-23 1179. The common motion of this bright, wide pair seems certain. The WDS shows additional measures besides the ones here. WDS 06277+1001 = G 105-B2 This fairly wide pair lies in a crowded field on the galactic plane. The M-dwarf primary is accompanied by a cool white dwarf companion. WDS 06314-0134 = HD 291763 This is the last of three very wide (7') pairs in the table. It was mentioned by the Lowell observers as a possible common-motion pair, but they found the motion vectors to differ by 12\deg in position-angle. However, a naive difference of USNO-A2.0 minus 2MASS for the companion (which is G 106-54) shows that its motion is essentially identical to the brighter HD star. The relative offsets over a 45-year baseline shown here demonstrate this more precisely. WDS 06413-0108 = RJHA 38 +37 This is another emission-line star, known as such back into the 1960s from work by Madona Dolidze, but not reported as double until Robertson \& Jordan (1989) listed them separately. WDS 06440+0800 = G 110-16 This Lowell proper-motion star has a very faint companion that becomes visible on the 2MASS images, from which estimates were made. WDS 06457-0202 = RJHA 55 Another emission-line star found by Robertson \& Jordan (1989) that has a faint companion. It is also a likely T Tauri system. WDS 07064-1005 A close pair lying in the field of the open cluster NGC 2335, first noticed visually by Juan Clari\'a in his 1973 photoelectric study of the cluster. The UBV colors are of a somewhat-reddened late-B star. WDS 07068-1007 Another pair in the NGC 2335 field first noted by Clari\'a. The shift since the AC2000 measure and the POSS-I plates (epoch 1958.9) suggest this could be an optical pair. WDS 07069+1808 = G 110-38 These were reported as separate objects by Lepine \& Shara, but not recorded in the WDS. WDS 07070-1004 A third Clari\'a pair in NGC 2335. The UCAC3 measure has slightly different epochs for the two stars, but is reasonably consistent with the contemporaneous 2MASS observation. WDS 07286+1939 = BD+19 1739 Another large delta-magnitude binary involving a late-G dwarf and late-M dwarf. The 2000.0 measure was found by applying the proper motion of the primary to the GSC-2.3 epoch position of the secondary to bring it up to 2000, then taking the difference with respect to the UCAC2 position of the primary. This will be sufficient until additional observations are made. WDS 07406+4930 ABC = BD+49 1656 This line of three similarly-bright stars includes a common-motion pair and a third optical companion, which is drawing slowly away from AB. WDS 08178+3746 = G 111-B9 A wide K dwarf plus cool degenerate binary with clear common motion, as shown by the measures here. WDS 08283+7308 = BD+73 415 The common motion of this pair was noticed by comparing the POSS-I scans with recent images. WDS 08310+4012 = EUVE J0831+40.2 Although observed previously as a binary, no details were provided for this pair of x-ray-bright M dwarfs. Visual comparison of the POSS-I scans with recent images shows that they have common motion and little relative change in 50 years. The separation and position angle were measured on SDSS images, since they are not resolved in the catalogue itself. WDS 08435-5258 = V373 Vel + V372 Vel These two variables are low-mass members of the open cluster IC 2391 showing H-alpha emission. Neither set of astrometric measures may be reliable, so additional data would be useful. WDS 08553-4716 = [SR88] 16019 This was noted as being double in an objective-prism survey by Slawson \& Reed (1988; this is Robert Slawson's PhD thesis). Even though both stars are fairly blue, the shift in position angle since the AC2000 measure suggests they are probably optical. WDS 08579-4613 AC = CD-45 4735 The original AB pair here is from Barton. The third component is quite red, and presumably a background M giant, since it is the brightest star in the near-infrared. WDS 08593-4730 = [SR88] 17027 Another pair from the Slawson \& Reed survey. It is resolved in UCAC3; even though the proper motion is incorrect there, the specifications are drawn from that catalogue. WDS 09008-4638 = CD-46 4831 = CPD-46 3319 Noted as double by Slawson \& Reed, the relatively blue 2MASS J-K color of the companion suggests this is possibly a physical pair. WDS 09042-4820 = CD-47 4626 = CPD-47 3042 This pair lies in a small dark region, and the companion could well be optical, viz. an obscured background star that comes up toward the red. The Slawson \& Reed spectral type may also be a compromise between the two stars. WDS 09057-4533 = CD-45 4852 = CPD-45 3423 This was noted as double by Slawson \& Reed. It is infortunately too close for available catalogues. I show a probably-spurious double entry from GSC-2.3, and an estimate from 2MASS images. Obviously further measures are desireable. WDS 09068-0848 = BD-08 2582 This pair lies only 15pc away, and so the companion adds to the census of `nearby' stars. WDS 09073-4752 = HD 78581 The companion is fairly blue and thus has a fair chance of being physically linked with the early-A type primary. WDS 09091-4819 = CD-47 4689 This Slawson \& Reed star is not resolved in astrometric catalogues, so only an estimate is shown for this large delta-magnitude pair. There is photometry of the combined light: V = 10.98, B-V = 1.30 (Westpfhal 1999), which is consistent with the spectral type if the system is somewhat reddened. WDS 09093-4804 = [SR88] 24036 This Slawson \& Reed pair is a little fainter than the CD/CPD limits. Again there is photometry of the combined light: V = 12.04, B-V = 0.55 (Westpfhal 1999), which is consistent with the spectral type. WDS 09115-4802 = CD-47 4726 = CPD-47 3138 Various modern catalogues show this pair to have common, albeit small motion, and the apparent fixed relative position over 100 years supports a physical link. WDS 09140-4724 = CD-46 5016 = CPD-46 3503 Flagged as double by Slawson \& Reed. Though also resolved in UCAC3, the 2MASS measure is adopted as a starting value. WDS 09142-4723 = CD-46 5017 = CPD-46 3504 A close, unequal pair marked as double by Slawson \& Reed. There is photometry of the combined light: V = 11.66, B-V = 0.43 (Westpfhal 1999), which is consistent with the spectral type. WDS 09155-4756 = CD-47 4788 = CPD-47 3191 Projected on a dark area, these relatively blue stars stay at about the same brightness at different wavelengths, suggesting they are in the foreground of the obscuring layer, and thus related. WDS 09158-4653 = HD 80038 The companion is HD 296843, and both stars appear to be dwarfs near K0 with common proper motion. WDS 09159+4015 = BD+40 2179 The very faint common-motion companion is visible even on the POSS-I images. WDS 09165+3021 = CLS 11 This pair was reported by Sanduleak \& Pesch (1988) in the course of a low-dispersion spectral survey of the northern galactic cap. Comparison of POSS-I with later images shows they have common motion. WDS 09239-4106 = HD 81398 + HD 81379 The physical link is certain due to the fixed position over a 107-year baseline, and the matching magnitudes and spectral types. The full spectral types by Nancy Houk (1978) are F6/7V and F8/G0V, reflecting modest uncertainty in the temperature types. WDS 09290+3804 = BD+38 2037 This Vyssotsky dwarf has a very faint companion that appears on the 2MASS and Sloan z-band images. The magnitude of the faint star is only an estimate. WDS 09309+4054 = G 116-34 These were reported as separate objects by Lepine \& Shara, but not recorded in the WDS. WDS 09361+3733 = HD 82939 It seems not to have been noticed until recently that this wide pair at 40pc distance share common motion and have nearly the same parallaxes. This may have been because attention was first drawn in the literature to the fainter star, so the primary was overlooked. Not all the available measures are shown in the table. The UCAC3-derived offset includes the early AC observations as well as intermediate-epoch results, so is definitive for the moment. WDS 09445+3255 = CLS 15 This Sanduleak \& Pesch double have very small proper motion, but their proximity argues for a physical link. WDS 09464+3251 = G 117-B11 Another confirmed M-dwarf/white-dwarf binary. WDS 09499+4111 = BD+41 2014 This star is shown as double by Lepine \& Shara. WDS 10006-5022 = HD 86956 The companion is CPD-49 3007, whose proper motion and color are consistent with it being a physical companion. WDS 10072+2927 = BD+30 1962 A difficult case where the companion is readily visible only on the SDSS z image, and only slightly oval in 2MASS images. WDS 10222+3649 = Wolf 357 This long-known motion star has a faint companion that is visible on the longer-wavelength SDSS and 2MASS images. The SDSS astrometry for the companion is nevertheless uncertain because of the large delta-magnitude. WDS 10314+4532 = BD+46 1635 The primary is another well-studied large-motion star at only 16pc distance with a new companion. Again the large delta-mag and proximity mean only an estimate of the separation is available. The magnitude for the companion is only a rough guess. WDS 10321+3240 = GD 122 Another WD+DM binary first shown to have common motion by Lepine \& Shara. The white dwarf primary is catalogued erroneously as a quasar with redshift of z = 0.56, but the large proper motion proves this is mistaken. WDS 10385-4213 AC = HD 92269 The AB pair is a close one found by Rossiter, and unobserved since 1945. He overlooked the more distant brighter star to the southeast, which shares common motion with the close pair. Only a few representative measures are shown to indicate that the wide pair is fixed. WDS 10524+7116 = 2MASS J10522570+7116281 An adventitious pair in the field of an unrelated GD star. The common motion is easy to see between POSS-I and later images. The 2MASS colors suggest a K and an M dwarf. WDS 10566+2722 = Ross 894 This pair was first noticed by Kuiper, who got spectra of both stars around 1940. His type for the faint companion (K6?) is too early, and I substitute an estimate based on the 2MASS J-K color. Since the pair seem to show significant relative motion between the POSS-I and recent images, I measured it on the oldest available plate from the Lowell 33cm `Pluto Camera' astrograph, yielding the 1932 observation shown in the table. The stars are only 0.08mm apart on the plate, so this surely has significant uncertainty, but seems to be consistent with later motion. In any case, alas, this seems to be an optical pair: both stars are moving west and somewhat south, but the RA motion of the primary is roughly twice as fast as that of the companion. WDS 11015+3119 = CLS 33 This is another pair reported by Sanduleak \& Pesch. The two stars are not obviously optical, but motions are small. However, the northeast component is significantly brighter in the near-IR, so doesn't seem faint enough in the visible to fit the usual delta-mag/absolute-mag relation. WDS 11037+3253 AC = BD+33 2071 The brighter AB pair here is a well-observed common-motion binary known since John Herschel's time. There is also a bright star about 37" NW that is unrelated. However, the various digitized sky survey images show a third fainter star closer to A that becomes gradually brighter at longer wavelengths, and so is a likely M dwarf companion. It was first noticed visually by Ed Weis (1993). WDS 11041-5949 ABC = CPD-59 2992 = CD-59 3519 The star indicated as HD 305940 on HDE chart 138 is given the type F8. Inspection of images shows this is an optical 9" trio. The visually brighter component is however a K giant per slit-spectrum by Beatriz Garcia (1993); for the fainter star (but brighter in blue) she gives F5:V:. Thus the HDE number applies to the B component of the trio. Garcia also gives UBV photoelectric photometry for the two stars that is consistent with this conclusion. The fainter very red third component lies about 2".5 north of the brighter star. It almost certainly a distant M giant, since it is the brightest of the three in the 2MASS K-band image. WDS 11107-5224 = CD-51 5405 This pair was noticed in the field about 3' southeast of WDS 11104-5224 = Rst 5572. WDS 11107-5903 = HD 303917 This mid-B type star was reported to have H-alpha emission by Jack MacConnell (1981). It appears to be double on various DSS and 2MASS images, but the nature of the pair is uncertain. It may be a blue star having a very red optical companion superposed, or (much less likely) a zeta Aurigae-type binary involving a cool supergiant and a hot main-sequence companion. Spectra in the far-red or near-infrared would help decide. WDS 11153-5936 ABC = CPD-58 3375 = CD-58 3942 This trio is led by the luminous early-B star also catalogued as LS 2277. Since the field is crowded, optical companions are not unexpected, and both of these may be chance alignments. The C component in particular is almost certainly a background M giant since it comes up only in the near-infrared. The position-angle of the DENIS measure of BC is in error, though the separation agrees with 2MASS. WDS 11254+5422 = RX J112524.9+542221 One of many late-type binary x-ray sources listed by Keith Mason et al (2000). WDS 11255+1004 = BD+10 2284 The available observations of this K-dwarf binary suggest a slight decrease in separation and increase in position-angle since the early AC2000 measures. WDS 11299-3123 = Ruiz 439-162 + 163 This faint large-common-motion pair was identified and studied by Ruiz \& Maza (1988, 1990), who provided both photometry and spectral types for these cool white dwarfs. The Schmidt plate-scan astrometry is consistent over a 17-year baseline. WDS 11367-6312 = HD 308688 This pair lies in the field of the nebulous cluster IC 2944. Unfortunately only UCAC3 resolves it well, but the erroneous proper motions mean the derived J2000 positions are incorrect. It is a little too close for 2MASS and DENIS. WDS 11369+3408 = CLS 41 Another ambiguous-motion M-dwarf pair from Sanduleak \& Pesch. The USNO-A2.0 measure is probably too close due to proximity effects on the plates; the CMC14 measure suffers from having only a single observation of the companion --- and at mag 18 with only a 17cm aperture telescope! WDS 11386-6322 = ArMa 81 This pair was noted by Ardeberg \& Maurice (1977) as a pair during their photometric survey of IC 2944. It is poorly resolved in UCAC3, and the offsets shown in the table may be somewhat in error. WDS 11387-6323 = ArMa 84 Another Ardeberg \& Maurice (1977) pair. I show only an estimate of the separation and position angle. WDS 11460+2843 = GSPC P319-F This star is from the {\it Guide Star Photometric Catalogue} (Lasker \& Sturch et al 1988), and appears to be an M dwarf of moderate common proper motion. The relative orientation of the pair appears to be fixed since the time of the POSS-I plates. WDS 11463-4615 = HD 102290 This wide pair of mid-F(?) stars appear to have common proper motion; the slightly fainter northern component is HD 102289. WDS 11526-3129 = Ruiz 440-387 + 386 Identified by Ruiz \& Maza (1990). WDS 11539-0007 = G 11-29 A conventional M-dwarf binary missed both by Luyten and the Lowell observers, perhaps because the companion was a little too faint on the blue-sensitive plates they used. The stars are wide enough that several measures are available, including one from a galaxy survey obtained using the 2.4-m Isaac Newton telescope (Liske et al 2003). WDS 11562-5826 = CPD-57 5111 = CD-57 4201 These two stars were recorded in a spectral survey by Lars Olaf Loden (1977) and appear to have common motion in recent astrometric catalogues. The similar magnitudes and and spectral types add evidence for their being a physical pair. WDS 11563+1102 = MCC 625 This Vyssotsky star, whose motion falls below the limits of the classical catalogues, has a likely common-motion companion. Plenty bright and well-separated, and even though the primary is included in the Lepine \& Shara proper-motion catalogue, the companion was missed. WDS 12007-3247 = Ruiz 440-489 + 490 This Ruiz \& Maza pair comprises two M dwarfs. WDS 12028-2947 = Ruiz 440-179 + 180 The primary is CD-29 9513, a mid-K dwarf with a distant M-dwarf common-motion companion first noted by Ruiz \& Maza. WDS 12041-2822 ABC = Ruiz 440-30 + 29 This is a faint, fairly close Ruiz \& Maza pair that are presently closing in on a third optical companion. WDS 12066-3137 = Ruiz 440-492 + 493 Another Ruiz \& Maza pair involving a late-M dwarf (taken as the primary here) and a cool white dwarf. WDS 12069+7008 = EUVE J1206+70.1 A pair first noticed by observers making follow-up observations of x-ray sources, this active M-dwarf binary could be as close as 20 to 25pc if the spectral type of the primary is exact. The primary has been found to be a double-lined spectroscopic binary with a period of a few days by Evgenya Shkolnik et al (2010), who suggest a distance of only 16pc. WDS 12102+0418 = BD+05 2592 The faint common-motion companion to this large-motion star is well resolved only in the 2MASS catalogue. WDS 12309-6550 = EE Mus A faint, red companion seems to be visible on the DSS far-red plate-scan and on 2MASS images, but this M-dwarf flare star is an unconfirmed double. WDS 12478-0836 = LHS 5228 It seems that WDS 12478-0835 = Brt 440 does not exist as described, at least it is not this star. However, the star does have a very faint common motion companion evident on Sloan and 2MASS images. Though no parallax is available, if Kuiper's spectral type for the primary is correct, then the system lies at about 30pc distance. If this distance and the (uncertain) magnitude for the companion are both correct, then it lies not far above the hydrogen-burning limit. WDS 12497+1613 = G 149-12 The companion to this Lowell proper-motion star becomes gradually better visible going from DSS to 2MASS to SDSS images. The available astrometry is relatively poor. WDS 12528+3344 = HD 111996 The faint companion to this K dwarf has only the somewhat uncertain Sloan measure, so a physical link is unconfirmed. WDS 12540+3243 ABC = CLS 62 USNO-B1.0 and SDSS show fairly similar motions for the wider AB pair from Sanduleak \& Pesch, so they could be related. Various red images show a third star close to the northern component, which is much redder and seems likely to be physical. The magnitude for component C is very uncertain. WDS 12577-1428 = HD 112575 At 24pc distance, this pair adds another star to the `nearby' census. The companion was first found about 1940 by Kuiper, who took spectra of both components. His type for the companion is too early, probably contaminated by the primary, and it is actually instead an early-M dwarf. WDS 13008+4213 = BD+42 2363 Despite the fairly bright primary and large delta-mag, the SDSS astrometry looks okay. WDS 13130+3750 = BPS BS 16929-035 The primary here is a metal-poor F-type star identified in the Beers et al (1996) survey. There seems to have been very little relative motion over 50+ years. WDS 13235+4637 = BPS BS 17436-016 This pair have photometric colors consistent with being an early-K dwarf and an M-dwarf companion. WDS 13260+3743 = BD+38 2445 This Vyssotsky K dwarf was first noticed to be double by Ed Weis (1993), who estimated a separation of 3" in pa 90\deg, with a delta-R of about 2 mag. The faint red companion is not resolved in the SDSS catalogue, so only an estimate is supplied here. WDS 13334+2607 = BD+26 2469 The Sloan measure is probably discrepant due to the greatly overexposed primary. The common motion, however, is clear on images at several epochs. WDS 13360+4829 = GD 375 Jesse Greenstein published separate spectral types as early as 1975, but the pair weren't identified as a visual binary in the literature until perhaps the papers by Wachter et al (2003), van den Besselaar et al (2005), and Farihi et al (2006). WDS 13514+2620 AB = MCC 701 This K dwarf is the close 0".3 binary YSC 50, but a similarly-bright companion is also present a few arcseconds north. The two measures are somewhat uncertain, thus an optical companion is not ruled out. WDS 14062-6543 = HD 122765 This is an optical pair involving a foreground G dwarf and a distant late-M giant that brightens dramatically toward the red, one of the brightest such examples I have seen. The faint red star was classified by Jack MacConnell (1993) in a survey of IRAS sources along the southern galactic plane. WDS 14075+4135 = BD+42 2466 Although the companion is 10 magnitudes fainter than the primary, it is well enough separated to be clearly present on the POSS-I plates and later, but has been missed heretofore. The star has intermediate color, and thus is evidently a degenerate star well down the white dwarf cooling curve (Mv = 15.5). WDS 14108+3642 = CLS 77 This Sanduleak \& Pesch binary has obvious common motion. Only the SDSS measure is available, however. WDS 14109+1513 AC = HD 124066 The original AB pair by Luyten is optical; the primary is a close pair first detected by Hipparcos. The extremely faint C component is visible only in far-red and near-infrared images. It has an absolute magnitude of about Mv = 20, and thus is probably a brown dwarf of (very) late-M or early-L type. Follow-up observations in 2010 by Tokovinin (2011) confirms the physical link of this object. The revised Hipparcos-2 parallax places the system at about 60pc. WDS 14260+3422 AF = BD+35 2558 The original very wide (9') pair was recognized in the Lowell proper-motion survey. Three additional WDS components (C,D,E) are all optical. However, the primary has a close companion visible in the SDSS z image and (less well) in the 2MASS images. The magnitude for the faint star is only an estimate. WDS 14597+1459 = Ross 995 This closer pair is resolved only in the Sloan catalogue. WDS 15061-5743 = CPD-57 6908 = CD-57 5822 Due to the small proper motion, this is only a `maybe' physical pair, though the components have similar photometric color. WDS 15079+8545 BC = BD+86 228 B This is the southwestern component of a wide pair of common-proper-motion K dwarfs. The faint C companion is visible on 2MASS images, from which an estimate of the separation and position-angle is given. WDS 15221-5027 = CD-49 9556 = CPD-49 8006 Tycho-2 records the southeastern component, which is taken here as the primary. Reed \& Thomas (1992) list this as an A0-type star, but the northwestern component is clearly a K giant. The pair is not resolved well in any catalogue, and I show both an estimate based on the 2MASS image for the secondary as well as a direct offset between Tycho-2 and 2MASS, which I think is too close. Some new observations would be useful. WDS 15337-5050 = CD-50 9557 = CPD-50 8197 This is a near-equal pair that appears in the Astrographic Catalogue and in the `Cape Faint' catalogue of 1939. Only two `bookend' measures are shown since several others are present in the WDS. WDS 15420+1302 = BD+13 2984 An unusual case where the companion is much brighter at shorter wavelengths than at longer ones, so it is presumably a white dwarf that must be well down the cooling curve in order for it to be so faint. WDS 15452-3819 AB = LDS 539 Luyten correctly noted the wider AC pair here, which involves an M dwarf and close WD+DM for the C component. Component B appears near A on recent images, and this must be a background optical companion. They are merged as far back as an overlapping pair of POSS-I `Whiteoak extension' plates from 1964 and 1965, but are just separated as indicated on the 2MASS images. WDS 15543+1416 = BD+14 2955 Another Vyssotsky K dwarf with a faint red companion. The SDSS astrometry is somewhat discordant due to the overexposed primary. WDS 16013+3714 = Ross 807 The primary of this pair is a spectroscopic binary with an eccentric 810-day orbit, so there are at least three stars in the system. WDS 16067+4730 = BD+47 2298 This pair certainly has common proper motion, but the POSS-I measure from USNO-A2.0 is probably skewed somewhat because the secondary is close to the diffraction spike of the primary. UCAC3 has three problematic entries for the two stars. WDS 16106+1632 = G 138-5 A relatively easy pair perhaps overlooked previously because at the epoch of the POSS-I plates the primary was superposed on a zero-motion background star. WDS 16124+3812 = KUV 16106+3820 This white dwarf from the Kiso ultraviolet survey has an M-dwarf companion first reported by Wachter et al (2003). A third background star lies about 10" to the north at present, but was much closer in the late 20th Century. WDS 16135+4428 = BD+44 2555 This K dwarf has a faint companion with clear common motion evident by comparing the POSS-I with recent images. Both of the measures are somewhat uncertain due the faintness of the secondary and/or overexposure of the primary. WDS 16147+5526 = G 225-50 This star is shown as double by Lepine \& Shara. The 2MASS measure seems to be reliable, so the SDSS observation is evidently problematic due to the overexposed primary. WDS 16202+4212 = G 180-49 The faint red companion is visible but not well recorded on either the SDSS z or 2MASS images. The measurement is my estimate from the SDSS z image via SkyView, and the magnitude for the companion is merely a guess. WDS 16243+5520 = HD 148329 A difficult pair due to the very large brightness difference --- the astrometry is uncertain, and the magnitude for the secondary is only a guess. WDS 16268+3148 = CLS 101 The final Sanduleak \& Pesch M-dwarf pair has ambiguous motion, but seems relatively fixed over the 14 years of the available astrometry. WDS 16396+6054 = BPS BS 16080-053 This is a mid-K dwarf pair with likely common motion found in a survey for metal-poor stars by Tim Beers et al (2007). It is resolved only in the 2MASS catalogue, so additional astrometry is desireable. WDS 16398+0530 = HD 150281 The faint companion here has been overlooked even though the primary has been otherwise well studied. WDS 16454+3651 = BD+37 2795 Located in the vicinity of Messier 13, the faint red companion here appears only at longer wavelengths. The two Sloan observations average to values close to the 2MASS measure. WDS 16461+5021 = HD 234344 The very faint companion to this K dwarf is some 12 magnitudes fainter than the primary. This makes finding direct differential astrometry from the same dataset problematic. The first entry in the table is the better of two differences from the overlapping POSS-I red plates via APM-Cambridge (McMahon et al 2000). The APM astrometry is generally not as good as USNO-A2.0, but does include single-plate detections omitted from A2.0 --- the companion is not present on POSS-I blue. The SuperCOSMOS scan of POSS-I red picks up both stars, but the astrometry primary is again poor due to overexposure. The independent scans of the same plate agree, however. Similarly I show competing epoch 2000.0 values from USNO-B1.0 and from the R\"oser et al (2010) PPMXL. The latter tries to link B1.0 with 2MASS and puts the motions on an absolute reference frame. The values are similar and confirmed by the bracketing measures from 2MASS and SDSS DR7. The whole series shows convincingly that the two stars are linked. WDS 16455+3350 = BD+34 2835 A straightforward pair with clear common motion evident from inspection of POSS-I versus recent images. The companion was missed by Lepine \& Shara as well as earlier observers. WDS 17031-5314 AC = HD 153580 The C component is BPM 24601, a white dwarf sharing common proper motion about 2' west of the primary. The two stars were first linked by Gary Wegner (1973), but no proper offsets were determined then. WDS 17088+3313 = BD+33 2834 Although reported by the Lowell observers in the mid-1960s, this pair was overlooked until recently. The white dwarf companion is otherwise well studied. WDS 17176+3532 This pair lies in the field of WDS 17177+3537 = ADS 10453, and measures were determined as an aid in sorting out possible identification problems related to ADS 10453. WDS 17177+3537 = ADS 10453 This pair is not new, but was first observed by Hough. Couteau also indicated a much closer companion that does not seem to be visible on recent images. His measures may belong to another pair, but the issue is undecided. WDS 17179+3533 = Wolf 676 This pair, also in the field of ADS 10453, was known to both Luyten and the Lowell proper-motion observers 50 years ago, but is new to the WDS. Since a spectrum was obtained around 1940 by Kuiper, perhaps he noticed it first. The significant proper motion means that even the short baseline of the relative astrometry shown here assures a physical link. WDS 17352-4841 = CD-48 11837 This nearby (10pc) M-dwarf pair has been overlooked until recently. It was identified by Richard Gray et al (2006), who gave MK classifications for both components. The separation is small enough that it is not resolved in any astrometric catalogues, so the values here are rather rough estimates. WDS 17459-1318 = G 154-B5 Despite being identified by Giclas et al, perhaps due to crowding and only modest motion, this DM+WD binary hasn't been listed until recently in the WDS. The primary is an Hipparcos star at 33pc distance. WDS 17529+0948 = HD 162867 The white dwarf companion to this bright HD star was identified in the Lowell proper-motion survey. WDS 17586-4059 = [M81] II-21 This star was identified by Jack MacConnell (1981) as an M star with H-alpha emission. However, I noticed the 2MASS color was much too blue to be a red-giant semiregular or Mira variable, as is usual for the MacConnell stars. Inspection of images showed it to be a 2" binary with modest proper motion, and identifiable as the x-ray source 1RSX J175835.4-405917; thus these are almost certainly dwarfs. Together with the magnitudes, MacConnell's type of M3e implies a distance of only 15pc; even if the type is one step earlier, the pair is only 25pc away. The proper motion vectors are: +10 and -72 mas/year in RA and Dec, respectively, using the simple difference of the AC2000 and 2MASS coordinates (most catalogue sources show incorrect motion). The oldest available digital image is a 1964 exposure from the POSS-I `Whiteoak extension'. This makes the common proper motion clear, and shows that there has been no discerable relative motion in the pair. The ASAS-3 survey photometry suggests the pair are slightly variable, which is unsurprising for emission-line M dwarfs. WDS 18227+4200 = SDSS J182242.17+415955.5 I noticed this close pair in the field of GD 377, which is unrelated. The Sloan photometric colors suggest the almost identical stars are dwarfs near M0. WDS 18454-6452 AB = HD 172555 The companion is CPD-64 3950 = CD-64 1208. This modest-motion pair has a long astrometric history, but the connection between them was missed. The B component is a close binary discovered by Beth Biller et al (2007) using the VLT in Chile. Only a few representative measures are shown for the wide binary. WDS 18480-0539 ABC = BD-05 4764 The brighter AB pair have similar blue colors, so one could suspect they are related. A fainter intervening star is present as well, which is probably a background red giant. The 1996 measure of AB by Camargo et al (2003) derives from 12 observations with the 20cm aperture Bordeaux CCD meridian circle. WDS 18534+1851 AC = G 184-40 The original very wide AB pair is attributed to Luyten (LDS 5867); the primary turns out to be a closer common-motion pair resolved in the Sloan catalogue. WDS 19440+0512 = G 23-9 It seems that Luyten or Lepine should should have picked this one up! It lies in a crowded field, so possibly the software got confused. I give an estimate from the POSS-I SkyView images mainly to secure the common motion. WDS 20073+3753 = G 125-61 This star is shown as double by Lepine \& Shara. The primary is currently near a mag 14.5 background star. WDS 20182+2319 AC = G 186-20 The original AB pair by Pourteau is optical, with the K dwarf primary moving fairly fast to the north. This star has a closer common-motion companion obvious on the Schmidt sky survey images, and resolved in the 2MASS catalogue. WDS 21004+3426 = GD 392 This double-degenerate pair was announced at about the same time by Farihi (2004) and Lepine \& Shara (2005). WDS 21379+2743 AC = BD+27 4120 This nearby (13pc) star needs additional work to sort out its components. The original B component measured by Milburn is optical. On 2MASS images a faint red companion is visible. Only estimates are available for the separation, position-angle, and magnitude. WDS 21385+1902 AB,C = G 126-17 The close Tycho pair is unconfirmed; a third component is present on images from POSS-I onwards. The primary was classified by Lee (1984) as a metal-weak G5 dwarf. WDS 21492-4133 = CD-42 15640 This M-dwarf pair was recognized visually by Donna Weistrop (1980), and separate spectra were obtained more recently; the double-star nature was noted explicitly by Stauffer et al (2010), but with no details. WDS 21549-7720 AC = HD 207496 The B component, recorded by Hipparcos, is not visible on any of the usual sky survey images. However, a second companion with obvious common motion is readily discerned to the northwest. This was first measured by Gliese \& Jahrei\ss (1991) for their nearby stars catalogue, but also by Rousseau et al (1996), evidently independently. I show both these measures since the former especially seems not to have been noticed before; its source is unknown (perhaps an ESO 1-m Schmidt plate or the 40cm GPO astrograph?). All the available measures are somewhat uncertain, but the link is secure since the system has travelled over 30" on the sky since the time of the Astrographic Catalogue observations. WDS 22036+3611 = GD 400 The blue GD star is the northwestern component, taken as the primary here, and assumed to be a white dwarf. The companion is equally bright in the visible, but dominates toward the near-infrared, and its 2MASS colors are consistent with an M dwarf. Only two rather rough values of separation and position-angle are shown. WDS 22351+1153 = HD 213996 This star has proper motion of nearly 0".5/year, and is bright enough to have a long astrometric history. The faint companion, however, is well resolved only in the 2MASS catalogue. WDS 22519+6504 = GD 553 The faint companion becomes visible on the SDSS z-band image and in 2MASS, so it is obviously very red. Its magnitude is only an estimate, as are the separation and position angle. WDS 22563+5831 = Sh 2-148 1 ABC This is the central illuminating star that fluoresces the HII region Sh 2-148. The 2MASS images suggest there are at least two companions, and a high-resolution image (HST or similar) would almost certainly reveal a compact star cluster. Rough estimates are shown for the two obvious components. Speckle observations might resolve at least these. WDS 23011+4056 = G 216-B14 Another DM+WD pair found by the Lowell proper motion survey. The companion is faint enough that finding published astrometry for both stars at the same epoch is a problem. In combination with the large annual motion, however, these measures are sufficient to confirm a physical link. WDS 23043+1054 = LHS 3892 This large-motion star has a faint companion that is just visible on 2MASS images; only estimates are available for separation, position-angle, and magnitude. WDS 23079+1710 = BD+16 4872 = StKM 1-2099 This fairly bright star was identified as a mid-K dwarf by Stephenson (1986); on cataloguing it I noticed a very faint late-M companion with common motion about 75" south. The primary also has a brighter optical companion that is only a few arcseconds southwest at present. The older measures from Schmidt plate-scans are slightly skewed by this star, and so give separations about 1" too close. The physical link between the common-motion pair is clear, however. WDS 23085-2848 = G 275-B8 This pair lies near the naked-eye star HR 8802. The motion is small, but UCAC2 and UCAC3 agree in making them have very similar motion, which seems to be confirmed by the relative astrometry over a 20-year baseline. WDS 23175+0942 = BD+08 5036 The common-motion companion here is far enough from the brighter Vyssotsky K dwarf that it is surprising that it has been overlooked heretofore. WDS 23210-3114 = GR* 387 + 388 These two stars were noted as a ``possible" physical pair by Giclas et al. They are wide enough to have good astrometric history in various catalogues. The differential measures here confirm the common proper motion. WDS 23239-2557 = GR* 396 This moderately-close pair has small common motion. WDS 23253-0837 = GR* 211 This unequal pair is readily visible on SDSS g,r,z images especially; the companion is also evident on 2MASS images. WDS 23267-2426 = GR* 408 + 407 Found by Giclas et al to have common motion, confirmed by the offsets over a 27-year baseline here. WDS 23280-0739 = HE 2325-0755 A metal-poor binary from the Hamburg-ESO survey (Christlieb et al 2004). Spectroscopy of the primary from the same cabal (Barklem et al 2005) shows a radial velocity of -237 km/sec, and stellar atmospheric parameters indicative of a metal-poor G giant, all suggesting a halo star. WDS 23297-2955 = GR* 419 I show only rough estimates for this close, large delta-magnitude pair. WDS 23299-1223 = GR* 224 + 223 These were noted by Giclas et al as having common motion, verified by the measures shown here. They are also a good common-motion pair in UCAC3, but not flagged as such. WDS 23305-3318 = 2MASS J23303276-3317505 This is not a GR star, but instead a random field pair noted in the same region. The colors are those of a G dwarf, but apart from their proximity there is nothing to say they're related. WDS 23307-3053 = CD-31 19317 Another non-GR field pair, these have the color of F dwarfs. The POSS-I images from 1954 suggest the position angle has increased a few degrees since then. WDS 23311-2730 = GR* 426 This pair is too close for the various catalogues, so additional observations will be necessary to establish its motion and magnitudes. WDS 23325-1742 = 2MASS J23322908-1741360 This close pair lies in the field of GD 1178, but is unrelated to it. Only an estimate of the separation and position angle is available. WDS 23326-1454 = GR* 228 The primary is an M dwarf per 2MASS colors (J-K = 0.88), but the companion is much bluer (J-K = 0.31), and so must be a cool white dwarf in order to be so faint intrinsically. WDS 23329-2608 = GR* 432 Apart from being equally-bright, this is very similar to GR* 426, and again only estimates are shown. WDS 23342-1531 = GR* 232 + 231 These were noted as a common-motion pair by Giclas et al. They were also recorded separately at different times by Luyten, but he evidently did not notice the connection, perhaps because of the wide separation. The primary is classified as type M0e by Riaz et al (2006), and is the x-ray source 1RSX J233410.9-153053. Christlieb et al (2008) found it to have low metal abundance, estimated to be [Fe/H] = -3.0, a factor of a thousand lower than the Sun. WDS 23381-1008 = GR* 241 The companion here would have been too faint to be visible on the Lowell `Pluto Camera' plates, but is resolved on SDSS and 2MASS images. WDS 23385-3020 = GR* 451 This is at the limit of reliable detections in the DSS and 2MASS images, and only rough estimates are given. WDS 23397-0853 = GR* 244 This pair is similar to GR* 241, but it is not resolved in the Sloan catalogue, so estimates are given instead. WDS 23401+6041 = G 241-62 Though only photometric distance estimates are available, this pair could lie at only 20pc. I estimated the separation and position-angle from the 2MASS J- and K-band images. WDS 23403-3142 = GR* 459 + 460 These were suspected of being a physical pair by Giclas et al, but are not: the northeastern component is moving fairly quickly away from the southwestern star. The UCAC3 offsets are shown; the proper motions in that catalogue are correct. WDS 23407+6257 BC = AG+62 1466 The AB pair is Stein 1195, which turns out to be optical: the western A component has been sliding south near the B component in the past century. However, a third similarly-bright star to the northeast (BD+62 2271) shares common motion with B, as shown by the measures here. UCAC3 includes intermediate-epoch astrometry, so the data there are reliable. All three stars are similar in color and spectral type. WDS 23416-0948 = GR* 247 Another close pair, but resolved in SDSS DR7. WDS 23431-2507 = GR* 468 A clear common-motion pair, but close enough that older measurements are lacking. WDS 23434+1447 = G 129-D1 It seems this is most likely to be an optical pair. The somewhat larger position-angle in the USNO-A2.0 measure is confirmed by independent scans of the same plates with APM-Cambridge and by the Edinburgh SuperCOSMOS machines. The intermediate angle at the middle dates also suggests this by comparison with observations near epoch 2000. Various catalogues showing proper motion give values for the two stars that are similar but not identical. WDS 23438-1253 = GR* 250 This somewhat wider pair has a longer astrometric history that clearly demonstrates their common motion. WDS 23443-1611 = G 273-B15 Another Lowell DM+WD pair. The blue companion is so faint in the 2MASS data that I think the measurement is poor, and that the Carlsberg astrometry is probably better. An estimate is also given from the POSS-I plate-scan. WDS 23456-2531 = GR* 475 Another close pair just recognizable on DSS/2MASS images, and a rough estimate is given from the latter. WDS 23474-1136 = GR* 258 These two stars are below the resolution limit of the 2MASS catalogue, so estimates of separation and position angle from the images are shown. WDS 23484-1018 = GR* 259 There is Sloan coverage for this star, which provides the sole accurate measurement and photometry. WDS 23501-2911 = GR* 485 Although fairly close, this is resolved in the 2MASS catalogue. WDS 23515-1344 = GR* 266 This somewhat wider pair has a longer astrometric history that clearly demonstrates their common motion. WDS 23521-2745 = GR* 491 + 492 This pair was noted by Giclas et al as a likely physical pair, but their estimates of the proper motion were uncertain: it is indeed quite small. WDS 23532-2403 = GR* 499 Despite their very similar colors, the position angle of this pair is steadily decreasing, and they are certainly optical. This is more readily evident from visual comparison of the POSS-I plate scans with recent images rather than the measures here, though they do show the same trend to a lesser degree. WDS 23535-0804 = BD-08 6206 The POSS-I measure of the faint white dwarf allows the physical link to be made with the bright K dwarf primary. WDS 23555-1606 = GR* 274 + 273 This pair was noted as having common motion by Giclas et al. The measure from the POSS-I plates is shown here even though the separation is almost certainly incorrect; there is no obvious change in separation or position angle since the epoch of the POSS-I. ******************************************************************************* Name RA (J2000) Dec s Va Vb spec epoch theta rho aper meth source WDS 00007-1216 0 00 39.47 -12 15 52.9 U 16.0 18.0 M: 1998.898 353. 2.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 00100-0636 0 09 57.39 -06 36 14.9 U 15.2 16.2 M: M4.5V 1954.676 8.1 256.23 48 G USNO-A2.0 1989.890 8.2 256.54 48 G GSC-2.3 1994.952 8.2 256.41 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1998.789 8.2 256.53 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 8.2 256.51 8 E UCAC2 2003.80 8.2 256.46 7 M CMC14 mean epoch WDS 00132+0536 AC 0 13 12.35 +05 36 23.7 U 12.9 10.6 2000.0 227.0 62.12 8 E UCAC2 WDS 00132+0536 CD 0 13 09.20 +05 35 43.0 U 10.6 12.1 K5Ve 1998.876 48.9 5.08 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00178-1436 0 17 48.32 -14 36 23.5 U 10.7 14.7 K: 1994.952 27.7 4.43 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1998.479 28.3 4.24 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00244-2940 0 24 23.83 -29 39 44.3 M 13.5 15.4 M2 1998.676 22.8 2.52 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00319-1610 0 31 53.46 -16 10 25.1 M 14.7 15.1 M: 1994.985 355.6 3.94 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1999.65 356.2 3.86 8 E UCAC3 2000.780 355.6 3.89 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.367 355.9 3.65 7 M CMC14 WDS 00321-0511 AB,E 0 32 08.28 -05 10 43.3 U 8.5 14.4 K0V 1951.599 351.5 430.96 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.1 351.4 431.08 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1998.760 351.4 431.25 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 351.4 431.02 8 E UCAC2 WDS 00325-1753 0 32 30.43 -17 53 22.4 U 16.6 18.4 DA 1994.953 59.1 4.40 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 00341+2524 0 34 08.48 +25 23 49.7 T 11.3 12.8 K5V 2004.713 105. 1.1 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 00344+0009 0 34 26.36 +00 09 03.2 M 12.4 16.9 K5 2000.665 52.0 5.78 40 Ede DENIS 2000.665 53.3 5.90 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.679 52.2 6.01 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 00361+2821 0 36 03.89 +28 21 13.1 U 12.3 13.3 K4V 1999.895 210. 1.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 00374-0714 0 37 21.94 -07 14 10.2 M 14.8 17.9 WD? M: 1951.599 49.5 35.94 48 G USNO-A2.0 1982.705 49.7 36.04 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1989.827 49.5 35.97 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.827 49.9 35.97 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.852 49.9 35.95 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 49.5 35.88 48 G USNO-B1.0 2003.827 49.5 36.14 7 M CMC14 WDS 00376-1512 0 37 36.30 -15 11 52.9 U 12.5 15.4 1999.83 178.7 7.32 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.808 178.5 7.44 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.203 178.6 7.23 7 M CMC14 WDS 00391+7919 0 39 06.19 +79 19 09.6 U 12.2 14.1 K6e 1983.847 322.3 11.81 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.816 322.2 11.96 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 322.2 12.01 8 E UCAC3 WDS 00399-1051 0 39 55.02 -10 51 08.7 S 15.2 15.6 M: 1989.827 279.0 7.52 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.750 278.7 7.64 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.813 278.7 7.57 40 Ede DENIS 1999.81 278.8 7.69 8 E UCAC3 2000.740 279.1 7.64 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2003.731 278.6 7.67 7 M CMC14 WDS 00404+1825 0 40 26.79 +18 24 31.1 M 11.7 12.6 K5 1997.758 271.9 5.07 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.88 272.6 5.13 8 E UCAC3 2000.895 272.0 4.99 7 M CMC14 Flo 135 0 42 10.71 -74 13 53.8 M 11.8 12.3 G2 1909.840 176.0 2.02 13 G AC2000 2000.0 180. 2.3 8 E UCAC3 mean 2000.756 173. 2.3 51 E2m 2MASS mean WDS 00429+2240 AB 0 42 56.76 +22 39 34.7 U 11.7 13.7 M1 1997.758 325. 3.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 00429+2240 CD 0 42 55.64 +22 39 37.1 M 17.0 17.0 1987.70 342.3 5.90 48 G GSC-2.3 mean epoch 1997.758 341.6 6.06 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.706 345.7 5.80 7 M CMC14 WDS 00450-0754 0 45 01.47 -07 53 43.2 M 10.9 13.9 K7V 1998.750 44.8 4.06 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00457+4208 0 45 40.54 +42 08 06.6 M 13.4 13.4 K4 1998.843 280. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate 2007.01 298. 2.0 Ofek et al, spurious? WDS 00466+4129 0 46 37.49 +41 29 05.3 M 15.0 15.0 G2 K1 1998.923 114.2 3.95 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.096 113.7 3.73 7 M CMC14 WDS 00471+2700 0 47 04.72 +27 00 19.8 U 10.3 13.7 K4/5 1953.778 91.1 34.18 48 G USNO-A2.0 1984.2 91.5 34.11 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1997.824 90.7 34.23 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 91.0 34.12 8 E UCAC3 2001.676 91.0 34.19 7 M CMC14 WDS 00479-3254 0 47 54.15 -32 53 48.5 U 13.2 15.2 sdF/G 2000.794 153.4 4.02 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00486-3317 0 48 38.18 -33 17 17.1 M 14.7 14.7 K: 1998.868 70.1 5.13 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00514+1844 0 51 21.75 +18 44 21.3 U 9.2 17.0 K6V 1953.997 142. 11.7 48 G POSS-I estimate 1997.761 141.6 12.52 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00570-0542 0 56 59.21 -05 42 07.1 M 15.2 16.1 M: 1998.701 109.4 4.43 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.839 108.8 4.29 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 1999.86 110.6 4.43 8 E UCAC3 2003.717 108.9 4.27 7 M CMC14 WDS 01037-2445 1 03 39.35 -24 44 56.6 b 16.7 20.5 DC6 M: 1985.260 137.3 9.05 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.863 137.9 9.08 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.556 137.1 9.55 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.608 137.8 9.17 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.0 138.0 8.91 48 G USNO-B1.0 WDS 01076+4949 1 07 35.06 +49 48 35.6 U 9.4 15.4 K0 M: 1953.784 300.5 52.12 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.915 300.9 52.42 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 301.0 52.44 8 E UCAC2 2003.096 300.8 52.27 7 M CMC14 WDS 01083+2753 AB 1 08 16.60 +27 52 51.4 U 14.6 15.2 sdO K: 1998.153 --- 3.37 94 H Heber et al 2002 2000.0 130.0 3.49 51 E2m UCAC2 minus 2MASS 2001.643 134.5 3.53 7 M CMC14 WDS 01083+2753 AC 14.6 16.0 1998.153 140. 4.48 94 H Heber et al 2002, uncertain WDS 01083-3535 1 08 20.77 -35 34 41.7 U 14.7 15.9 DA1.5 M2 1985.136 174.8 111.01 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.786 174.6 111.44 40 Ede DENIS 1997.918 174.9 111.19 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.994 174.6 111.23 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 174.9 111.07 8 E UCAC3 WDS 01155-3206 1 15 28.78 -32 06 10.5 U 14.6 16.3 M3: 1998.871 145.1 7.95 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 144.9 7.90 8 E UCAC3 WDS 01176-0919 1 17 38.83 -09 18 53.8 S 14.9 15.6 M3/4 2000.740 60.3 1.45 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01179-3454 1 17 55.24 -34 53 31.6 M 14.9 15.9 M: 1998.871 255.9 3.28 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 01183-1711 1 18 18.75 -17 10 37.0 b 16.6 16.6 1998.512 136. 2.1 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 01262-2212 1 26 14.38 -22 11 41.4 S 11.4 14.9 K4 1995.122 114.2 2.51 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01278-1054 AC 1 27 46.54 -10 54 05.7 T 6.4 14.9 K3III M: 1998.769 276.3 196.19 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 276.2 196.01 8 E UCAC3 WDS 01288-1723 1 28 47.72 -17 23 12.9 U 10.3 14.4 K: 1954.671 346.1 19.55 48 G USNO-A2.0 1982.640 345.8 19.90 48 G GSC-ACT 2000.887 346.1 20.04 51 E2m 2MASS 2005.320 345.8 19.88 7 M CMC14 WDS 01291-2410 1 29 07.59 -24 10 24.1 U 11.0 13.8 G: K: 1987.372 250.7 20.20 48 G USNO-A2.0, uncertain 1998.823 249.3 20.10 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.627 249.3 20.09 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 249.3 20.12 8 E UCAC2 2004.652 249.3 20.11 7 M CMC14 WDS 01297+4228 1 29 42.58 +42 28 17.2 b 14.9 19.0 DA2 M: 1999.701 218.2 4.94 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.708 218.5 4.90 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01300-0039 1 29 58.36 -00 38 40.5 S 14.1 15.4 1990.640 249.5 8.61 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.717 249.3 8.49 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.652 249.3 8.48 40 Ede DENIS 2001.598 249.2 8.46 7 M CMC14 2002.679 249.6 8.40 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01301+6249 1 30 05.20 +62 49 10.5 M 12.0 12.0 B0 K5 1999.739 27.6 2.37 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 01327-1922 1 32 39.35 -19 21 40.4 U 15.7 19.0 DOQZ1 M: 1995.122 180. 1.1 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate 2000.0 189. 1.0 51 E2m UCAC2 minus 2MASS WDS 01330-2128 1 33 02.36 -21 27 32.4 S 15.1 16.0 M: 1995.122 36.3 0.98 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01340-0141 1 34 02.13 -01 41 10.0 U 9.8 14.8 G0 1951.684 20.8 432.95 48 G USNO-A2.0 1982.864 20.8 431.62 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 2000.0 20.8 431.90 8 E UCAC2 2000.657 20.8 431.92 40 Ede DENIS 2000.904 20.8 431.92 7 M CMC14,n=4 WDS 01359-1326 1 35 56.44 -13 25 47.3 M 14.1 14.1 M: 1998.545 45. 1.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 01360-2330 1 36 02.70 -23 29 34.5 U 15.8 15.8 M: 1983.746 256.0 11.81 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1986.563 258.2 11.71 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt far-red 1987.372 256.8 11.90 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.713 257.5 11.66 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.936 257.8 11.76 40 Ede DENIS 2004.690 258.6 11.90 7 M CMC14 WDS 01362-1302 1 36 09.02 -13 01 32.7 U 14.8 14.8 K: 1998.545 60. 1.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 01416+6100 1 41 36.71 +60 59 40.3 U 10.8 13.8 F5 2005.841 84. 2.7 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 01433-0152 1 43 17.72 -01 51 22.4 M 16.0 16.0 M: 1998.726 22.8 4.58 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.961 22.2 4.72 40 Ede DENIS 1999.91 22.0 4.91 8 E UCAC3 2002.274 22.9 4.74 7 M CMC14 WDS 01438-3219 1 43 46.04 -32 18 56.1 U 15.2 16.9 M: 1991.904 350.2 7.14 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.879 350.2 7.07 40 Ede DENIS WDS 01446-0112 1 44 35.93 -01 11 44.7 S 14.1 14.4 M: 2002.679 264.5 1.47 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01448-1732 1 44 47.99 -17 32 23.5 U 15.0 15.7 K: 1983.812 282.9 11.97 48 G USNO-A2.0 1995.122 284.1 11.68 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1996.923 283.4 11.62 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.813 284.0 11.75 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 284.2 11.58 8 E UCAC2 2005.008 284.0 11.59 7 M CMC14 WDS 01456+6108 AB 1 45 37.81 +61 07 59.1 U 12.4 15.6 Be 1998.0 326.3 3.00 24 F Pigulski et al 2001 2005.841 329.2 2.99 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01456+6108 CD 1 45 38.85 +61 07 51.0 S 15.5 15.6 1998.0 238.7 2.12 24 F Pigulski et al 2001 2005.841 235.8 2.08 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 01459-0103 1 42 52.22 -01 03 18.9 b 15.4 16.1 K: K: 1951.684 149.3 65.29 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.15 149.2 65.33 8 M ACR 1997.888 149.1 65.23 48 G GSC-2.3 2002.679 149.1 65.36 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2002.734 149.1 65.28 7 M CMC14 WDS 01499+1056 1 49 51.64 +10 55 54.9 U 11.7 13.1 G: 2000.720 21.1 5.50 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.890 20.8 5.39 7 M CMC14 WDS 01532+0911 1 53 10.30 +09 11 26.8 L 14.2 17.6 M4 DZ: 1949.893 308.6 9.64 48 G USNO-A2.0 1991.689 309.4 10.14 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.257 309.6 10.30 7 M CMC14 2000.0 309.8 9.69 48 G USNO-B1.0 2000.0 298.7 9.69 51 E2m LSPM (sic) WDS 01576+0711 1 57 36.22 +07 11 03.9 U 13.3 14.3 2005.781 216.1 2.93 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 02009-1546 2 00 56.71 -15 46 09.8 M 14.8 15.6 DBA M3V 1953.863 172.7 5.68 48 G USNO-A2.0 (sic) 1995.122 173.0 7.81 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1999.649 172.9 7.75 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.887 172.7 7.79 51 E2m 2MASS 2005.014 172.1 7.85 7 M CMC14 WDS 02047+7538 2 04 39.04 +75 38 19.0 L 15.6 18.9 DA M: 1954.723 25.6 33.55 48 G USNO-A2.0 1993.640 26.0 33.86 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.126 25.9 33.87 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 02055-1431 2 05 28.41 -14 31 11.2 S 15.5 15.7 M: 1995.133 299.7 2.66 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 02236+2228 2 23 34.20 +22 27 28.8 U 8.3 15.9 G0 DA5 1953.778 88.6 25.51 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.683 89.3 26.09 48 G GSC-ACT 2004.724 89.8 25.73 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2005.844 89.6 26.30 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 02480+5611 AB 2 48 04.39 +56 10 52.7 T 11.6 15.5 K5 1999.780 235.8 4.21 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 236.9 4.10 51 E2m LSPM WDS 02513+0128 2 51 20.11 +01 28 29.3 M 13.7 15.7 2000.665 45. 3.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 02517-0816 2 51 44.45 -08 16 09.6 U 9.9 14.8 K4V M4 1955.807 20.7 157.82 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.783 20.8 157.45 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.797 20.6 157.80 40 Ede DENIS 2000.738 20.7 157.64 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2004.038 20.7 157.55 7 M CMC14 WDS 03155+4029 3 15 27.49 +40 28 45.6 U 12.0 12.5 K7 1994.172 36. 1.7 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 03295+1248 3 29 32.27 +12 48 10.0 U 11.5 15.4 G8 1997.742 129.6 11.14 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.75 130.1 11.20 8 M Bordeaux 2000.909 129.5 11.06 7 M CMC14 WDS 03342+7335 3 34 12.34 +73 34 31.1 T 10.3 14.7 K8V 1983.850 99.6 12.59 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.126 100.4 12.76 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.81 100.3 12.65 8 E UCAC3 WDS 03417+0924 3 41 42.43 +09 23 33.2 U 11.8 16.4 G8 1994.325 304.3 7.20 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2000.0 300.5 7.11 51 E2m LSPM 2000.019 302.2 7.27 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.904 301.6 7.14 7 M CMC14 WDS 03435-1318 3 43 28.9 -13 18 16 M 16.5 16.5 WD M 1984.973 77. 3.2 48 G UK Schmidt estimates WDS 03492+5023 AC 3 49 13.1 +50 23 17 U 9.2 10.9 F8 G: 1904.188 79.8 35.76 13 G AC2000 1954.761 80.2 35.21 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.78 79.8 35.37 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1984.44 79.5 35.37 16 G FONAC 2000.0 79.4 35.32 8 E UCAC2 2004.790 79.6 35.29 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 04202+3336 4 20 11.20 +33 35 37.0 L 15.3 17.8 DA3 M5 1955.810 134.6 70.57 48 G USNO-A2.0 1989.826 134.4 70.16 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.0 134.4 70.30 51 E2m LSPM 2003.63 134.1 69.99 7 M CMC14 mean epoch WDS 04232+5008 4 23 09.90 +50 07 43.1 M 12.6 13.2 A/F 1999.783 143.7 4.01 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 05008+1432 5 00 52.56 +14 31 46.7 U 13.6 16.6 K4: 2000.0 319. 2.5 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 05034+0506 5 03 26.29 +05 05 49.7 L 12.4 12.5 M1 2000.055 100.5 5.22 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.537 101.4 5.21 7 M CMC14 WDS 05078+0904 5 07 45.75 +09 04 18.2 U 12.2 12.5 K7 1954.846 197.9 17.28 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.89 199.0 17.76 48 G GSC-ACT,n=4 2000.0 199.0 17.79 8 E UCAC2 2000.830 199.0 17.79 7 M CMC14 WDS 05105+3139 5 10 31.42 +31 39 28.7 U 11.2 11.2 A2 A0 1910.466 27.0 44.99 13 G AC2000 1982.796 26.9 45.13 48 G GSC-ACT 2000.0 26.9 45.06 8 E UCAC2 2003.030 26.9 45.05 7 M CMC14 WDS 05115+0527 5 11 29.47 +05 27 15.4 U 11.4 12.2 K0 2000.0 227.7 2.36 8 E UCAC3 WDS 05123+0317 5 12 15.92 +03 17 05.5 U 11.4 12.3 F0 1910.102 208.6 39.25 13 G AC2000 1954.846 208.8 39.29 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.3 208.5 39.25 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 2000.0 208.6 39.36 8 E UCAC2 2000.071 208.6 39.35 7 M CMC14 WDS 05282+0258 5 28 14.60 +02 58 14.3 L 12.8 17.0 M3 2000.060 174.8 4.44 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 05472+0000 5 47 13.85 +00 00 17.1 M 15.0 15.0 M0e M0.5e 1998.764 110.4 3.81 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.975 112.4 3.70 7 M CMC14 2000.08 111.1 3.97 8 E UCAC3 WDS 06040+3015 6 03 58.62 +30 15 25.4 U 11.7 12.7 B0.5V 2000.0 217. 2.6 51 E2m UCAC3 minus 2MASS estimate WDS 06201-2306 6 20 05.45 -23 06 19.2 T 7.9 9.8 A9V 1917.144 39.1 51.75 13 G AC2000 1991.25 39.3 51.86 11 T Tycho-2 2000.0 39.3 51.82 8 E UCAC3 WDS 06277+1001 6 27 44.05 +10 00 52.1 M 13.3 16.6 M2V DCZ6 1951.914 310.7 125.93 48 G USNO-A2.0 1989.845 310.5 125.73 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.802 310.5 125.63 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.778 310.6 125.96 7 M CMC14 WDS 06314-0134 6 31 23.11 -01 34 14.5 U 10.1 13.9 K2 1955.881 169.3 434.39 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.066 169.3 434.63 40 Ede DENIS 1998.947 169.3 434.25 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.025 169.3 434.35 7 M CMC14 WDS 06413-0108 6 41 16.51 -01 07 40.3 M 13.7 14.5 1998.802 8.9 5.88 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.882 9.3 5.83 7 M CMC14 2000.09 9.3 5.93 8 E UCAC3 WDS 06440+0800 6 44 00.73 +07 59 36.7 U 11.4 19.0 K3 1999.816 92. 2.9 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 06457-0202 6 45 43.43 -02 01 52.4 M 13.7 15.7 1998.947 115. 3.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 07064-1005 7 06 24.0 -10 04 43 T 12.1 12.1 B: 1999.137 0. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 07068-1007 7 06 49.03 -10 06 40.8 M 12.7 12.7 1903.150 7.9 3.54 13 G AC2000 1997.096 358.0 5.64 40 Ede DENIS 1999.137 358.2 5.68 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.02 357.8 5.67 8 E UCAC3 2004.550 357.7 5.59 7 M CMC14 WDS 07069+1808 7 06 54.13 +18 08 11.2 U 11.0 17.0 G8 1997.873 345.1 9.21 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07070-1004 7 06 57.59 -10 04 23.2 M 13.5 14.0 1999.137 233.6 3.76 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 234.6 3.85 8 E UCAC3 WDS 07286+1939 7 28 33.57 +19 39 11.0 U 9.3 18.2 G8 2000.0 349. 23.4 48 G UCAC2 minus GSC-2.3 WDS 07406+4930 AB 7 40 36.48 +49 30 08.9 T 9.1 10.6 F8 G: 1901.554 79.1 22.69 13 G AC2000 1983.851 77.9 22.47 48 G GSC-ACT 1991.25 78.8 22.65 11 T Tycho-2 epoch 2000.0 78.7 22.63 8 E UCAC3 2003.913 78.8 22.62 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 07406+4930 AC 9.1 11.7 F8 1983.851 72.1 43.34 48 G GSC-ACT 1991.25 72.1 43.72 11 T Tycho-2 epoch 2000.0 71.6 43.95 8 E UCAC3 2003.913 71.5 44.16 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 08178+3746 8 17 49.85 +37 46 10.3 U 13.7 15.4 K5V 1953.025 63.0 66.61 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.130 63.7 66.69 48 G GSC-ACT 1989.913 63.8 66.58 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.285 63.8 66.52 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.967 63.8 66.48 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2002.852 63.9 66.44 7 M CMC14 WDS 08283+7308 8 28 17.52 +73 08 11.4 U 10.3 12.9 F: 1900.037 304.0 8.87 13 G AC2000 2000.0 304.5 8.99 8 E UCAC3 2000.225 304.8 8.96 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 08310+4012 8 31 01.68 +40 12 11.7 S 14.0 14.0 M4Ve 2001.964 123. 2.0 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 08435-5258 8 43 27.75 -52 57 39.2 U 14.2 14.2 K:e K:e 1999.060 16.4 2.38 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 17.1 3.41 8 E UCAC3 WDS 08553-4716 8 55 19.16 -47 16 27.8 U 12.6 13.3 A0V 1903.781 181.8 6.08 13 G AC2000 1996.060 176.1 6.02 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 175.9 6.03 8 E UCAC2 WDS 08579-4613 AC 8 57 53.19 -46 13 15.0 T 11.2 14.0 G8III 1997.142 21.7 7.41 40 Ede DENIS 1999.115 21.7 7.45 40 Ede DENIS 1999.200 22.1 7.50 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 08593-4730 8 59 19.85 -47 29 36.9 U 13.7 13.7 G2III 2000.0 40.4 2.10 8 E UCAC3 WDS 09008-4638 9 00 45.89 -46 38 09.5 U 11.8 13.0 B9V 1902.13 52.5 5.82 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1999.118 53.1 5.90 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 52.9 6.06 8 E UCAC2 WDS 09042-4820 9 04 09.25 -48 19 46.4 U 12.5 12.5 K0V 2000.260 33.1 3.99 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 09057-4533 9 05 39.49 -45 33 15.1 T 11.8 11.8 F4V 1999.0 335.5 2.15 48 G GSC-2.3, spurious? 1999.200 351. 2.6 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 09068-0848 9 06 45.35 -08 48 24.6 U 9.5 14.5 K7V 1998.413 264.7 8.04 40 Ede DENIS 1999.017 264.0 8.23 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 09073-4752 9 07 16.19 -47 52 26.1 U 9.4 11.6 A3IV 1901.190 17.3 7.02 13 G AC2000 1999.10 16.9 6.29 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 WDS 09091-4819 9 09 06.50 -48 18 34.0 U 11.0 13.5 G5 2000.016 235. 2.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 09093-4804 9 09 15.75 -48 03 58.1 U 12.8 12.8 G0 2000.016 263.5 2.84 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 09115-4802 9 11 31.86 -48 01 59.5 U 11.3 11.9 F7 1902.157 340.2 7.10 13 G AC2000 1999.060 339.8 7.19 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 340.1 7.22 8 E UCAC2 WDS 09140-4724 9 13 59.62 -47 23 34.3 U 12.7 12.7 F6III 1999.203 36.1 3.35 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 09142-4723 9 14 10.72 -47 22 59.5 U 11.9 13.4 F2V 1999.203 149.8 4.48 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 09155-4756 9 15 32.58 -47 56 07.7 U 11.7 13.1 A5V 1999.148 267.0 8.12 40 Ede DENIS WDS 09158-4653 9 15 49.64 -46 53 23.8 T 10.3 10.7 G6/K0 K0 1905.819 23.0 24.57 13 G AC2000 1976.14 23.3 24.42 40 G Rousseau 1979.223 19.9 24.08 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.148 22.6 24.49 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 22.6 24.55 8 E UCAC2 2000.038 22.7 24.53 40 Ede DENIS WDS 09159+4015 9 15 55.00 +40 14 35.6 U 10.4 20.0 G5 1998.274 289.5 10.68 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.038 289.3 10.85 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09165+3021 9 16 32.99 +30 20 40.3 S 15.2 15.8 M5 1998.214 82.1 4.80 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.6 80.7 4.79 8 E UCAC3 mean epoch 2003.219 81.6 4.64 7 M CMC14 2003.316 81.1 4.74 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09239-4106 9 24 00.36 -41 05 07.6 U 8.6 8.8 F6V F8V 1900.079 228.0 87.81 13 G AC2000 1962.24 228.1 87.59 8 G CPC2 1976.23 228.3 87.30 40 G Rousseau 1977.065 228.2 87.74 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.225 228.1 87.70 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 228.2 87.60 8 E UCAC2 2007.0 228.0 87.74 27 T AKARI WDS 09290+3804 9 28 57.11 +38 03 57.6 U 10.5 19.0 K5V 1998.246 247. 4.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate 2002.950 244.1 4.79 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09309+4054 9 30 53.99 +40 54 15.4 U 11.1 19.6 M0 1998.246 54.7 7.23 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.106 55.2 7.43 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09361+3733 9 36 04.28 +37 33 10.4 U 8.3 11.0 G5 K5V 1953.940 121.7 162.27 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.184 121.5 162.38 48 G GSC-ACT 1990.14 121.5 162.24 16 G FONAC 2000.0 121.5 162.33 8 E UCAC3 2003.0 121.4 162.56 100 Esd SDSS DR7 mean epoch 2007.0 121.7 162.26 27 T AKARI WDS 09445+3255 9 44 28.16 +32 55 23.8 S 16.3 18.4 M5 1998.181 97.4 5.59 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.291 97.4 5.36 48 G GSC-2.3 2003.316 99.3 5.49 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2004.130 99.5 5.48 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09464+3251 9 46 21.15 +32 51 17.7 b 15.3 17.2 M5 DA 1955.196 13.7 12.27 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.181 15.4 11.80 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.291 15.8 12.25 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.0 15.5 12.20 48 G USNO-B1.0 2001.715 16.1 12.29 7 M CMC14,n=4 2004.130 16.2 12.25 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09499+4111 9 49 51.66 +41 11 06.6 U 9.9 16.0 G3 1998.255 122.5 11.36 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.950 124.2 11.47 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 10006-5022 10 00 38.47 -50 22 03.8 T 9.0 10.8 F5V 1902.796 354.1 16.11 13 G AC2000 1975.18 354.5 16.87 40 G Rousseau 1996.186 352.9 16.35 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 352.8 16.43 8 E UCAC2 WDS 10072+2927 10 07 10.24 +29 27 22.7 U 9.4 18.6 G2 2004.288 102.9 3.32 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 10222+3649 10 22 14.01 +36 49 07.1 U 10.9 17.5 K2 2003.316 340.0 3.42 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2004.130 346.6 3.53 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 10314+4532 10 31 24.22 +45 31 33.8 U 8.9 18.0 K7V 2000.0 90. 4.8 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 10321+3240 10 32 05.85 +32 40 07.6 S 16.1 17.5 DB M 1954.255 278.4 33.86 48 G USNO-A2.0 1988.131 278.5 34.03 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II blue 1989.176 278.6 33.89 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.928 280.1 34.34 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 279.0 33.95 48 G USNO-B1.0 2000.0 278.1 34.42 51 E2m LSPM 2000.099 278.6 33.86 7 M CMC14 2004.288 278.6 33.96 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 10385-4213 AC 10 38 29.45 -42 12 51.2 U 9.2 8.1 F: A8V 1904.127 160.3 21.58 13 G AC2000 1962.2 161.0 21.58 8 G CPC2 mean epoch 2000.0 160.5 21.63 8 E UCAC2 WDS 10524+7116 10 52 25.71 +71 16 28.1 M 14.1 15.8 K: M: 1999.203 354.9 7.11 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.98 355.1 7.11 8 E UCAC3 WDS 10566+2722 10 56 34.79 +27 22 05.1 U 12.2 15.8 K5V M3? 1932.249 250. 9.8 13 G Pluto camera plate, estimate 1955.221 245. 9.3 48 G POSS-I estimate 1998.164 225.3 5.06 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 222.5 4.75 8 E UCAC2 minus UCAC3 2004.957 218.6 4.61 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 11015+3119 11 01 29.24 +31 18 40.7 S 17.4 17.6 M5 1998.216 69.9 5.82 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.384 68.2 5.83 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.983 68.0 5.71 7 M CMC14 2004.367 69.5 5.69 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 11037+3253 AC 11 03 40.95 +32 53 14.8 T 10.6 15.0 K4V 1998.219 68.9 5.19 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.283 71.6 5.17 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 11041-5949 AB 11 04 08.20 -59 48 52.9 U 10.4 10.8 K2III F5V 1894.060 229.3 7.81 13 G AC2000 1996.315 231.7 8.85 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 231.8 8.94 8 E UCAC2 WDS 11041-5949 AC 10.4 16.0 2000.093 10. 2.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 11107-5224 11 10 39.14 -52 23 39.0 U 11.1 13.7 1996.383 240.8 10.65 40 Ede DENIS 1999.375 241.0 10.62 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 11107-5903 11 10 44.88 -59 02 53.9 T 10.2 10.2 B5 2000.093 115. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 11153-5936 AB 11 15 15.39 -59 36 01.1 U 10.9 12.0 B: 1897.3 354.6 6.96 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 2000.0 352.4 7.28 8 E UCAC2 2000.082 353.1 7.22 40 Ede DENIS WDS 11153-5936 BC 11 15 15.27 -59 35 53.9 U 12.0 18.0 2000.068 57.5 3.60 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.082 72.4 3.54 40 Ede DENIS (sic) WDS 11254+5422 11 25 25.10 +54 22 19.7 M 15.5 15.7 M4e M4e 2000.238 101.0 5.24 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.248 101.4 5.19 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2003.5 100.3 5.16 8 E UCAC3 mean epoch WDS 11255+1004 11 25 31.78 +10 04 28.1 U 11.0 11.2 K5 1912.411 191.1 7.45 13 G AC2000 2000.164 194.3 7.18 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.42 194.2 7.26 8 E UCAC3 2000.879 194.1 7.21 7 M CMC14 2002.944 194.9 7.19 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 11299-3123 11 29 52.05 -31 22 47.1 b 18.8 19.8 DQ DC9 1980.135 79.6 22.86 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1986.129 78.7 22.52 40 Gsc SuperCOSMOS ESO Schmidt red 1991.142 78.9 22.70 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt red 1991.142 79.0 22.66 48 G GSC-2.3 = UK Schmidt red 1997.208 78.0 22.84 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt far-red WDS 11367-6312 11 36 39.61 -63 11 54.8 U 11.6 12.6 A3 2000.0 307.3 3.25 8 E UCAC3 WDS 11369+3408 11 36 54.41 +34 08 06.3 S 15.9 18.3 M5 1950.367 258.6 5.23 48 G USNO-A2.0, uncertain 1998.351 258.6 6.85 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.346 259.9 6.67 48 G GSC-2.3 2002.8 262.6 7.18 7 M CMC14 mean epoch 2004.291 258.6 6.87 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 11386-6322 11 38 38.8 -63 21 58 U 14.4 14.4 2000.0 91.1 2.36 8 E UCAC3, uncertain WDS 11387-6323 11 38 41.7 -63 22 55 U 13.3 13.3 2000.0 100. 2.0 48 G DSS estimate WDS 11460+2843 11 46 02.37 +28 43 25.9 S 13.8 15.8 M: 2004.957 199.8 2.06 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 11463-4615 11 46 18.48 -46 14 38.5 T 8.2 8.7 G0 G 1901.741 0.4 54.02 13 G AC2000 1962.2 0.4 54.56 8 G CPC2 mean epoch 2000.0 0.5 54.34 8 E Tycho-2 minus UCAC2 2000.0 0.5 54.32 8 E UCAC3 minus UCAC2 WDS 11526-3129 11 52 37.39 -31 28 32.8 U 13.7 15.5 K4 M1 1981.719 263.2 13.87 48 G USNO-A2.0 1984.265 263.2 13.99 40 Gsc SuperCOSMOS ESO Schmidt red 1996.345 262.8 14.03 40 Ede DENIS 1999.293 262.7 14.07 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 262.8 14.01 8 E UCAC3 WDS 11539-0007 11 53 54.63 -00 07 17.5 U 13.6 16.4 M0 1952.084 286.1 9.46 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.290 285.0 9.60 48 G GSC-2.3 1997.183 285.8 9.76 40 Ede DENIS 1999.221 286.3 9.74 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1999.463 284.7 9.67 7 M CMC14,n=4 1999.7 285.5 9.77 98 F Liske et al 2003 2000.255 285.5 9.77 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 11562-5826 11 56 09.86 -58 25 47.5 U 10.8 11.2 A0/1 A1 1909.057 238.2 10.34 13 G AC2000 2000.0 238.3 10.48 8 E UCAC2 2000.134 238.3 10.50 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 11563+1102 11 56 20.31 +11 01 44.3 U 11.0 16.9 K4/5V 1955.281 98.8 15.62 48 G USNO-A2.0 2000.173 101.4 16.22 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.277 100.8 16.21 7 M CMC14 2002.945 101.4 16.26 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12007-3247 12 00 43.73 -32 47 21.8 U 15.3 16.0 M4 M4e 1975.408 103.2 8.48 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1981.719 104.2 8.31 48 G USNO-A2.0 1991.274 104.5 8.69 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.244 104.6 8.71 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 12028-2947 12 02 50.20 -29 47 19.5 U 12.7 16.3 K4 M3 1979.171 38.6 85.21 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1981.719 38.5 85.44 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.411 38.6 85.37 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.550 38.7 85.44 40 Ede DENIS 2004.252 38.6 85.29 7 M CMC14 WDS 12041-2822 AB 12 04 04.95 -28 21 38.0 M 17.0 18.2 M0 M2 1998.411 347.2 4.25 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 12041-2822 AC 17.0 17.0 M0 1998.411 269.7 5.34 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.468 269.4 5.00 40 Ede DENIS 2004.246 270.2 4.71 7 M CMC14 WDS 12066-3137 12 06 37.66 -31 37 11.8 M 19.2 19.7 M5 DZ7 1979.171 9.3 5.74 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1981.719 9.3 5.68 48 G USNO-A2.0 1995.104 7.6 5.66 48 G GSC-2.3 WDS 12069+7008 12 06 55.76 +70 07 49.0 U 12.4 15.0 M2.5V M4Ve 2000.0 62.5 5.54 8 E UCAC3 WDS 12102+0418 12 10 11.59 +04 18 28.5 U 9.2 15.0 K3 2000.178 87.0 3.66 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 12309-6550 12 30 56.36 -65 50 24.4 U 14.8 14.8 Me 2000.304 225. 1.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 12478-0836 12 47 46.90 -08 36 16.8 U 12.0 19.0 M1 1994.326 267.6 4.78 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2000.342 267.1 4.80 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 12497+1613 12 49 42.31 +16 12 35.2 U 11.4 14.2 M2 1998.058 199. 2.7 51 E2m 2MASS estimate 2005.416 204.7 2.83 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12528+3344 12 52 48.59 +33 44 15.3 U 9.5 15.5 K4V 2004.283 220.5 4.36 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12540+3243 AB 12 54 01.78 +32 43 00.8 S 17.3 17.4 M5 1950.364 179.0 15.05 48 G USNO-A2.0 1989.242 179.3 14.47 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.189 179.4 14.42 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.394 179.3 14.59 7 M CMC14 2004.362 179.9 14.53 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12540+3243 AC 17.3 21.0 M5 2004.362 200.4 1.87 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12577-1428 12 57 43.95 -14 27 48.7 U 9.1 12.9 K4.5V K5: 1996.121 300.6 6.30 40 Ede DENIS 1999.162 299.5 6.38 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 298.6 6.38 8 E UCAC3 WDS 13008+4213 13 00 45.56 +42 12 44.2 U 11.2 15.8 K6V 2003.248 44.1 2.85 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13130+3750 13 12 57.41 +37 49 53.7 U 13.0 15.1 F: 1950.367 44.6 28.18 48 G USNO-A2.0 1990.067 43.6 27.95 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.290 43.3 27.97 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.375 43.3 27.96 7 M CMC14 2004.207 43.2 27.92 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13235+4637 13 23 31.67 +46 37 04.2 M 13.9 16.4 K: 1999.320 146.7 5.88 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.191 147.6 5.89 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13260+3743 13 25 28.34 +37 43 09.9 U 11.1 15.0 K7V 2003.316 98. 2.9 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 13334+2607 13 33 21.11 +26 07 11.5 U 9.9 15.7 K2 1997.455 80.9 4.49 51 E2m 2MASS 2005.050 85.1 5.01 100 Esd SDSS DR7, uncertain WDS 13360+4829 13 36 01.78 +48 28 46.1 S 14.0 16.6 DB4 M 2003.087 71.8 3.01 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13514+2620 13 51 22.43 +26 19 33.4 U 11.0 13.5 K6V 2000.277 0.6 2.74 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.447 2.3 3.22 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 14062-6543 14 06 10.04 -65 43 27.2 U 9.4 16.0 G2V M7 1996.37 91.2 4.83 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.140 88.9 4.23 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 14075+4135 14 07 27.17 +41 35 01.8 U 9.9 19.7 G8 WD? 1955.281 103.1 30.37 48 G USNO-A2.0 2003.226 103.7 30.33 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 14108+3642 14 10 45.38 +36 41 49.6 S 14.2 15.9 M5 2003.316 276.8 2.97 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 14109+1513 AC 14 10 55.77 +15 12 55.8 U 8.3 25.0 G8V L0? 2000.126 274.3 12.58 51 E2m 2MASS 2005.364 272.9 12.65 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 14260+3422 AF 14 25 59.95 +34 22 15.2 U 10.4 19.0 K0 2003.316 298.6 2.50 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 14597+1459 14 59 41.09 +14 58 45.1 U 12.9 15.4 M0 2005.354 155.9 1.59 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 15061-5743 15 06 08.38 -57 42 31.8 U 11.7 12.2 1910.979 239.4 5.50 13 G AC2000 1998.509 238.7 5.88 40 Ede DENIS 1999.55 238.7 5.89 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 1999.430 238.0 5.85 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 238.5 5.93 8 E UCAC2 2004.5 238.5 5.93 32 T GLIMPSE-I WDS 15079+8545 BC 15 07 47.07 +85 44 59.7 T 11.1 15.0 K2:V: 1999.293 240. 3.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 15221-5027 15 22 05.90 -50 26 42.9 U 11.5 11.8 A0 K? 2000.0 153. 2.9 51 E2m Tycho-2 minus 2MASS estimate 2000.0 152.2 2.73 51 E2m Tycho-2 minus 2MASS, uncertain WDS 15337-5050 15 33 41.12 -50 50 15.3 T 11.7 11.7 A0 A0 1903.506 73.9 5.89 13 G AC2000 2000.329 77.0 5.59 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 15420+1302 15 42 00.36 +13 02 14.4 U 10.3 17.7 K2 WD? 2005.359 291.4 4.89 100 Esd SDSS DR7,n=2 WDS 15452-3819 AB 15 45 11.78 -38 18 49.3 M 14.7 14.9 M: 1999.364 332. 2.7 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 15543+1416 15 54 15.83 +14 16 27.0 U 9.7 17.5 K5 1998.145 280.1 7.84 51 E2m 2MASS 2005.195 278.84 7.88 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2005.362 284.05 7.95 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16013+3714 16 01 16.29 +37 14 21.2 U 13.0 16.7 G5 2003.406 77.9 1.67 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16067+4730 16 06 40.01 +47 30 13.5 U 9.9 15.3 K4V 1955.298 269.1 13.66 48 G USNO-A2.0 1999.348 264.6 11.35 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.364 264.3 11.27 7 M CMC14 WDS 16106+1632 16 10 33.72 +16 31 41.0 U 10.7 16.7 K2 1998.334 11.9 7.08 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.420 11.8 7.08 100 Esd SDSS DR7,n=2 WDS 16124+3812 16 12 21.28 +38 12 26.4 S 16.8 18.8 DA M: 2002.350 36.6 3.99 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2003.180 36.8 3.96 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16135+4428 16 13 29.67 +44 27 58.9 U 9.7 17.3 K5V 1999.348 114.7 10.23 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.375 116.2 10.89 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16147+5526 16 14 44.90 +55 25 49.5 T 11.2 15.7 K3 1999.315 203.3 3.85 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.453 204.7 3.53 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16202+4212 16 20 12.34 +42 12 10.9 L 11.7 18.0 G6 2002.438 91. 2.3 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 16243+5520 16 24 17.44 +55 19 55.1 T 6.9 18.0 F8 1999.315 123.1 17.46 51 E2m 2MASS 2005.416 123.6 18.56 100 Esd SDSS DR7, uncertain WDS 16268+3148 16 26 48.64 +31 48 02.7 S 16.2 16.6 M5 1989.349 250.0 5.30 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.257 250.9 5.29 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.876 251.4 5.16 7 M CMC14 2003.407 251.1 5.29 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16396+6054 16 39 33.12 +60 53 43.6 M 11.8 13.7 K: 1999.318 67.1 3.03 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 16398+0530 16 39 49.99 +05 30 26.0 U 8.7 15.0 K2 2000.348 315. 3.6 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 16454+3651 16 45 23.91 +36 51 02.4 U 10.0 17.6 K4/5 1998.329 12.6 5.87 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.378 11.2 5.73 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2002.438 13.2 5.99 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16461+5021 16 46 07.64 +50 20 41.2 T 9.5 21.4 K3 M7V 1955.244 147.8 66.14 48 G APM-Cambridge POSS-I red 1955.244 148.0 66.39 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-I red 1998.455 146.2 66.01 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 146.0 65.75 48 G USNO-B1.0 2000.0 146.3 65.90 48 G PPMXL 2005.417 146.2 65.94 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 16455+3350 16 45 32.28 +33 49 48.3 U 9.5 14.0 K2/3 1999.367 146.5 8.02 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.438 148.6 8.00 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2003.180 148.2 7.98 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 17031-5314 AC 17 03 08.70 -53 14 13.1 T 5.3 13.5 F5V DA4 1999.482 258.2 113.71 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 257.8 113.78 8 E UCAC3 2000.0 258.0 113.49 8 E Tycho2 minus UCAC3 WDS 17088+3313 17 08 49.24 +33 12 55.4 U 8.6 15.9 F8 DA4 1954.509 83.3 36.64 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.268 85.4 35.42 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.395 84.7 35.62 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 17176+3532 17 17 37.96 +35 32 24.2 U 11.9 14.9 1994.635 244.2 4.74 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1998.271 246.3 4.71 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.481 245.0 4.76 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 17177+3537 17 17 44.24 +35 37 02.9 T 9.3 12.4 A2 1994.635 274.6 8.15 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1998.271 275.5 8.01 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.427 274.8 7.94 7 M CMC14 2002.44 274.3 7.97 8 E UCAC3 WDS 17179+3533 17 17 55.60 +35 32 49.1 L 13.8 15.3 M3 1994.635 260.4 4.72 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1998.271 261.1 4.71 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 261.1 4.71 51 E2m LSPM 2003.481 260.2 4.70 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 17352-4841 17 35 13.58 -48 40 51.2 T 10.1 13.0 M1V M3V 2000.433 315. 4.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 17459-1318 17 45 53.35 -13 18 22.3 U 11.9 14.3 M3V DA7 1954.487 36.5 32.80 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.680 32.8 32.16 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.320 33.3 32.24 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.789 33.3 32.19 40 Ede DENIS 2002.520 33.2 32.28 7 M CMC14 WDS 17529+0948 17 52 56.57 +09 48 13.7 U 9.4 15.7 K2V DC 1956.204 210.3 24.30 48 G USNO-A2.0 2000.0 209.1 24.73 51 E2m LSPM 2000.293 208.8 24.78 7 M CMC14 2000.394 209.4 24.54 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 17586-4059 17 58 36.43 -40 59 27.0 M 12.6 12.6 M3e 1999.608 235. 1.8 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 18227+4200 18 22 42.15 +41 59 55.8 S 15.5 15.8 2005.444 194. 1.6 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 18454-6452 AB 18 45 26.90 -64 52 16.5 T 4.8 9.5 A7V K5V 1905.0 64.9 71.54 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1971.593 64.5 71.58 8 G CPC2 1991.25 64.6 71.50 11 T Tycho-2 epoch 2000.0 64.6 71.42 8 E Tycho-2 minus UCAC2 WDS 18480-0539 AB 18 48 01.04 -05 38 56.3 M 11.6 11.8 A0V 1896.8 162.5 9.24 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1996.7 164.3 9.31 8 M Camargo et al 2003 1998.561 164.7 9.46 40 Ede DENIS 1999.605 164.9 9.43 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.52 164.7 9.50 8 E UCAC3 2002.553 164.8 9.42 7 M CMC14 WDS 18480-0539 AC 11.6 14.3 1999.605 142.6 4.70 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.53 143.0 4.73 8 E UCAC3 2002.553 143.3 4.52 7 M CMC14 WDS 18534+1851 AC 18 53 22.91 +18 53 06.0 T 11.8 12.7 M1 2004.710 240.2 2.73 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 19440+0512 19 43 57.28 +05 12 06.8 L 11.3 17.1 K7 1950.526 249. 13.9 48 G POSS-I estimate 1993.456 245.7 13.91 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.591 244.1 13.78 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.731 243.9 13.75 7 M CMC14 WDS 20073+3753 20 07 18.55 +37 52 43.6 T 11.7 16.2 M0 1950.605 155.7 22.19 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.474 156.7 22.90 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.657 157.0 22.93 7 M CMC14 WDS 20182+2319 AC 20 18 14.38 +23 18 50.4 U 11.3 14.0 K3 1999.493 23.5 5.04 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 21004+3426 21 00 21.51 +34 26 21.0 L 16.0 19.2 DB5 DC 1951.517 103.9 46.35 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-I red 1989.497 104.3 46.74 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II blue 1992.495 103.3 46.81 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II red 2000.0 102.7 46.34 51 E2m LSPM WDS 21379+2743 AC 21 38 00.39 +27 43 25.5 U 9.9 15.0 M0.5V 1999.884 23. 2.7 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 21385+1902 AB,C 21 38 32.32 +19 02 08.7 U 10.3 18.3 G5 1951.725 88.9 15.61 48 G USNO-A2.0 1999.750 90.6 16.22 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 90.6 16.20 51 E2m LSPM 2004.783 90.5 16.32 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 21492-4133 21 49 11.32 -41 33 28.9 U 12.0 12.7 M0 M0 1998.3 155.8 2.86 8 E UCAC3 mean epoch WDS 21549-7720 AC 21 54 51.31 -77 20 16.8 T 8.4 12.1 K3V M2.5V 1894.9 290.3 6.95 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1975.8 307.7 8.74 40 G Rousseau mean epoch 1980.8 306. 7.85 Gliese \& Jahrei\ss 1991 1999.634 308.4 7.53 40 Ede DENIS,n=3 1999.925 308.9 7.71 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 22036+3611 22 03 35.09 +36 11 30.2 C 17.6 17.6 WD? M: 1992.665 165. 3.6 48 G POSS-II red estimate 2000.0 166. 3.5 51 E2m CMC14 minus 2MASS WDS 22351+1153 22 35 05.67 +11 52 53.1 U 8.7 17.0 K2 2000.591 171.1 11.49 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 22519+6504 22 51 53.02 +65 03 59.2 U 11.9 18.0 K: M: 2003.738 87. 2.2 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 22563+5831 AB 22 56 17.19 +58 31 18.0 M 13.0 14.0 O8V 2000.468 108. 1.9 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 22563+5831 AC 13.0 15.0 2000.468 357. 2.2 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23011+4056 23 01 07.68 +40 56 19.6 U 11.7 16.8 sdK8 DA 1953.830 256.0 24.82 48 G USNO-A2.0 2000.0 257.7 25.02 48 G UCAC2 minus USNO-B1.0 2001.816 256.9 25.21 7 M CMC14 WDS 23043+1054 23 04 16.75 +10 53 49.0 L 11.9 16.0 K7 2000.693 120. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23079+1710 23 07 52.71 +17 10 15.2 U 10.8 18.4 K5 M: 1951.613 185.0 77.43 48 G USNO-A2.0 1990.704 184.6 77.38 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II red 1992.649 184.4 77.24 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II blue 1995.780 184.5 77.39 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II far-red 1997.726 184.9 78.17 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 185.0 78.13 48 G USNO-B1.0 WDS 23085-2848 23 08 27.76 -28 48 20.0 U 15.7 15.7 1983.562 1.3 14.16 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.542 0.9 14.10 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 0.9 14.10 8 E UCAC2 2003.745 0.9 14.08 7 M CMC14 WDS 23175+0942 23 17 32.31 +09 41 36.4 U 9.7 16.3 K5 1951.604 5.8 20.15 48 G USNO-A2.0 2000.665 7.3 20.71 7 M CMC14 2000.800 7.0 20.71 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23210-3114 23 20 57.80 -31 13 34.0 U 15.7 15.9 M: 1977.627 36.7 18.60 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1981.738 36.4 18.59 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.686 36.6 18.69 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.687 36.5 18.61 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 36.2 18.55 8 E UCAC3 WDS 23239-2557 23 23 56.47 -25 57 13.1 M 16.5 17.1 M: 1992.571 106.9 5.29 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.687 108.3 5.22 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23253-0837 23 25 18.88 -08 37 01.5 S 14.7 17.5 M: 2000.906 85.8 1.78 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 23267-2426 23 26 43.57 -24 26 17.2 U 14.4 15.0 M: 1977.553 221.7 8.72 48 G GSC-ACT 1992.571 221.2 9.00 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.808 220.9 8.85 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 220.9 8.91 8 E UCAC3 2004.594 220.9 8.89 7 M CMC14 WDS 23280-0739 23 27 59.62 -07 39 13.4 M 14.3 15.3 G: 1996.619 345.0 4.48 40 Ede DENIS 1998.775 344.8 4.68 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.671 344.0 4.82 7 M CMC14 WDS 23297-2955 23 29 42.38 -29 54 42.8 U 14.3 16.3 M: 1999.444 210. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23299-1223 23 29 54.11 -12 22 33.2 U 15.2 15.5 M: 1998.474 205.1 5.36 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 205.7 5.38 8 E UCAC3 2003.285 204.4 5.25 7 M CMC14 WDS 23305-3318 23 30 32.76 -33 17 50.6 M 15.2 15.3 G: 1999.567 229.2 4.39 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23307-3053 23 30 44.97 -30 53 19.0 M 12.3 12.8 F: 1999.567 91.7 5.48 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23311-2730 23 31 06.08 -27 30 01.3 U 15.0 17.0 M: 1999.444 315. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23325-1742 23 32 29.10 -17 41 36.0 U 14.3 16.3 1998.474 222. 2.1 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23326-1454 23 32 34.70 -14 54 03.0 U 15.5 16.5 M: DA: 1951.665 65.8 49.42 48 G USNO-A2.0 1988.750 65.5 48.95 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1990.723 65.5 48.92 48 G GSC-2.3 1994.774 65.7 49.30 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt far-red 2000.0 65.3 48.91 8 E UCAC3 2003.786 65.3 48.63 7 M CMC14 WDS 23329-2608 23 32 56.34 -26 07 56.9 U 16.0 16.0 M: 1999.444 30. 2.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23342-1531 23 34 11.02 -15 31 01.1 U 12.0 15.5 M0e 1951.665 223.7 108.10 48 G USNO-A2.0 1991.677 223.6 108.08 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.0 223.5 107.99 8 E UCAC2 2003.939 223.5 108.02 7 M CMC14 WDS 23381-1008 23 38 03.47 -10 08 17.2 S 15.3 18.1 M: 2000.737 166.2 2.65 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 23385-3020 23 38 27.54 -30 19 59.2 U 15.5 15.5 M: 1998.953 0. 1.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23397-0853 23 39 43.41 -08 52 34.6 U 15.0 18.0 M: 2000.737 199. 1.9 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 23401+6041 23 40 07.69 +60 41 19.4 T 11.4 15.0 M2 1999.786 119. 2.2 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23403-3142 23 40 16.28 -31 42 04.1 U 15.6 15.4 M: 2000.0 248.6 14.52 8 E UCAC3 WDS 23407+6257 BC 23 40 46.26 +62 57 01.2 U 10.0 10.1 1905.255 42.8 32.38 13 G AC2000 1991.25 43.0 32.63 11 T Tycho-2 epoch 1999.786 43.0 32.56 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 43.0 32.60 8 E UCAC3 WDS 23416-0948 23 41 34.99 -09 48 00.7 U 15.1 16.6 M: 2000.737 245.6 2.54 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 23431-2507 23 43 03.78 -25 07 20.1 U 15.2 16.4 M: 1996.686 181.9 6.39 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.457 181.9 5.98 40 Ede DENIS 2004.679 181.7 5.90 7 M CMC14 WDS 23434+1447 23 43 21.85 +14 47 15.9 b 14.1 14.4 sdM0 sdF5? 1951.607 135.4 22.61 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.620 132.9 22.60 48 G GSC-ACT 1992.684 132.4 22.64 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II far-red 1995.817 131.9 22.66 48 G GSC-2.3 1997.745 131.9 22.62 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.72 131.6 22.58 8 M Bordeaux 2000.698 131.6 22.66 7 M CMC14 2000.740 131.6 22.68 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2000.87 131.7 22.65 8 E UCAC3 WDS 23438-1253 23 43 47.80 -12 52 52.1 U 14.0 16.3 M: 1953.617 59.5 18.34 48 G USNO-A2.0 1991.677 58.7 18.47 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.561 58.8 18.44 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 58.9 18.46 8 E UCAC3 2003.734 58.9 18.35 7 M CMC14 WDS 23443-1611 23 44 20.22 -16 10 51.3 U 14.4 15.4 M0.5 DA 1951.665 1. 6.7 48 G POSS-I estimate 1999.424 3.0 5.58 51 E2m 2MASS, uncertain 2003.947 2.1 6.39 7 M CMC14 WDS 23456-2531 23 45 33.63 -25 31 08.9 U 15.3 15.3 M: 1998.854 100. 1.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23474-1136 23 47 21.5 -11 35 59 U 14.5 14.5 M: 1998.778 239. 2.9 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 23484-1018 23 48 23.56 -10 17 43.2 U 15.7 18.1 M: 2000.737 260.8 2.63 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 23501-2911 23 50 06.52 -29 10 45.8 M 15.7 16.7 M: 1998.854 297.1 3.27 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23515-1344 23 51 32.55 -13 44 01.4 U 15.0 16.1 M: 1953.617 289.1 29.45 48 G USNO-A2.0 1991.677 289.0 29.73 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.720 289.1 29.59 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 288.8 29.71 8 E UCAC3 2003.832 289.1 29.54 7 M CMC14 WDS 23521-2745 23 52 08.02 -27 44 58.4 U 14.2 16.0 M: 1996.612 27.0 7.15 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.729 29.4 6.69 40 Ede DENIS 2004.671 30.9 6.39 7 M CMC14 WDS 23532-2403 23 53 12.97 -24 02 56.3 U 15.0 16.2 M: 1996.686 104.3 7.83 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.627 103.1 7.55 40 Ede DENIS 2004.351 101.3 7.68 7 M CMC14 WDS 23535-0804 23 53 28.65 -08 04 19.5 U 11.1 15.4 K: DA3 1954.569 213.4 23.61 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.797 213.6 23.54 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.627 213.9 23.77 40 Ede DENIS 2003.780 213.4 23.70 7 M CMC14 WDS 23555-1606 23 55 30.83 -16 06 09.0 U 15.6 16.7 M: 1951.676 185.1 4.75 48 G USNO-A2.0 (sic) 1995.658 187.8 6.89 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.515 187.3 7.04 40 Ede DENIS 1999.71 187.2 6.99 8 E UCAC3 2004.345 188.5 7.00 7 M CMC14