--- submitted to Bob Argyle for Webb Society double star circular, 2012 Apr 14 Common Proper Motion Pairs and other Doubles Found in Spectral Surveys - 5. Miscellaneous pairs. Brian A. Skiff, Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff AZ 86001-4499, USA e-mail: bas@lowell.edu This report is the fifth in a continuing series presenting doubles identified while preparing various spectral surveys in machine-readable form. The pairs in the present list cover just about the entire sky, ranging from +85 to -73 degrees Declination. The primaries range in brightness from mag 6 to 18, and are drawn willy-nilly from all portions of the HR diagram --- from a luminous, but obscured Wolf-Rayet star to numerous M dwarfs and cool, ancient white dwarfs. Delta-magnitudes extend from near zero up to 10 magnitudes. Separations similarly range from the resolution limits of available images to over 2 arcminutes. In nearly every case it was possible to use existing sky-survey images in the visible and near-infrared to check for common proper motion. It is often the case that star catalogues have incorrect proper motions or are otherwise garbled, so the visual confirmation is essential. Together with the magnitudes and spectral types or photometric colors, this helps insure that the pairs are physical. Some of the pairs were first mentioned by various authors in papers in the literature, but no measures were given in publication, and they were thus not included the WDS. All such cases are described in the extensive notes below, and cited in the wide-ranging bibliography. The star magnitudes are as close to standard V as I can make them, either from various legit sources or estimates derived from catalogues. Most of the spectral types were collected from the literature, since that was what I was in the business of doing. A few, however, are estimated from the photometry simply so one has some idea of what sorts of stars are involved. Essentially all the astrometry derives from on-line `data-mining' of catalogues and images. In preparing the data table, I was able to collect additional measures drawn from sources, such as the WISE spacecraft mid-infrared survey, that became available after the pairs were first noticed. By contrast, in one instance I was pleased to make use of observations by Abbe\'e Lacaille from around the year 1750, and by Benjamin Gould in the 1870s, to extend the astrometric baseline by 150 years over what is otherwise available. A note is given for every pair to describe the source or astrophysical properties of the systems. References Brown, W. R., Allende Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Wilhelm, R., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., and Kurtz, M. J., Astron. J., {\bf 126}, 1362, 2003 Demers, S., Lamontagne, R., Wesemael, F., Fontaine, G., Barneoud, R., and Irwin, M. J., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 99}, 437, 1993 DePew, K., and 7 co-authors, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 414}, 2812, 2011 De Rosa, R. J., and 10 co-authors, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 415}, 854, 2011; arXiv preprint: {\tt http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.4363} Faherty, J. K., Burgasser, A. J., Bochanski, J. J., Looper, D. L., West, A. A., and van der Bliek, N. S., Astron. J., {\bf 141}, 71, 2011 Fresneau, A., Vaughan, A. E., and Argyle, R. W., Astron. J., {\bf 130}, 2701, 2005 Fresneau, A., Vaughan, A. E., and Argyle, R. W., Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 469}, 1221, 2007 Gigoyan, K. S., Sinamyan, P. K., Engels, D., and Mickaelian, A. M., Astrophysics, {\bf 53}, 123, 2010 Gould, B. A., {\it Argentine General Catalogue}, Resul. Obs. Nac. Argentino, {\bf 14}, 1886 Henderson, T., {\it A Catalogue of 9766 Stars in the Southern Hemisphere for the Beginning of the Year 1750, from the Observations of the Abb\'e de Lacaille, made at the Cape of Good Hope in the Years 1751 and 1752}, British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 1847. Jeffries, R.D., Naylor, T., Devey, C.R., and Totten, E.J., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., {\bf 351}, 1401, 2004 Lepine, S., Shara, M. M., and Rich, R. M., Astron. J., {\bf 124}, 1190, 2002 Luyten, W. J., {\it Bruce Proper Motion Survey}. The General Catalogue, vol. I, II, 1963 MacConnell, D. J., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 44}, 387, 1981 Petersson, J. H., Uppsala Astr. Obs. Medd., {\bf 29}, 1927 R\"oser, S., Demleitner, M., and Schilbach, E., Astron. J., {\bf 139}, 2440, 2010 Rousseau J. M., Perie J. P., Gachard M. T., Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser., {\bf 116}, 301, 1996 Ruiz, M. T., and Bergeron, P., Astrophys. J., {\bf 558}, 761, 2001 Spencer Jones, H. and Jackson, J., {\it Catalogue of 20554 Faint Stars in the Cape Astrographic Zone -40 to -52 Degrees for the Equinox of 1900.0}, Royal Observatory, Cape of Good Hope, 1939 Stephenson, C. B., Astrophys. J., {\bf 301}, 927, 1986a Stephenson, C. B., Astron. J., {\bf 91}, 144, 1986b Stock, J., and Wroblewski, H., Publ. Obs. Astron. Nacional, Cerro Calan, {\bf 2}, 59, 1972 Subasavage, J. P., Henry, T. J., Bergeron, P., Dufour, P., Hambly, N. C., and Beaulieu, T. D., Astron. J., {\bf 134}, 252, 2007 Terzan, A., Bernard, A., Fresneau, A., and Ju, K. H., Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci., Ser. B, {\bf 290}, 321, 1980 Terzan, A., and Bernard, A., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 46}, 49, 1981 Upgren, A. R., Grossenbacher, R., Penhallow, W. S., MacConnell, D. J., and Frye, R. L., Astron. J., {\bf 77}, 486, 1972 Van\"as, E., Uppsala Astron. Obs. Ann., {\bf 1}, part no 1, 1939 Vyssotsky, A. N., Astron. J., {\bf 61}, 201, 1956 Wroblewski, H., and Torres, C., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., {\bf 105}, 179, 1994 ******************************************************************************* Notes WDS 00065-4911 = CD-49 1 = CPD-49 1 The common motion of this pair was first reported in the `Cape Faint' catalogue (Spencer Jones \& Jackson 1939). The AC2000 measure derives from the Cape plates of this zone. WDS 00101+3825 DB = MCC 352 This Vyssotsky K dwarf (Vyssotsky 1956) was found to be a close binary by Hipparcos. A faint red companion is also present on the POSS-II red and far-red, and 2MASS images. The primary is the southwestern of a wide optical pair; several other faint components are listed in the WDS, all of which seem to be optical. WDS 00101+8529 = BD+84 1 This the first of a handful of pairs noticed while working on the very good early spectral survey at the north celestial pole by J. Harald Petersson (1927) in his Uppsala dissertation. The long astrometric baseline and similar colors assure a physical link. WDS 00175-4726 = CD-48 36 This is a `definite maybe' as far as having common proper motion, but needs another epoch to be sure the two stars are linked. WDS 00391-2533 = CD-26 200 The AC and GSC plate measures are somewhat discrepant, but even so the implication is that this is a physical pair. WDS 01151-4707 = CD-47 365 The UCAC3 data have inconsistent proper motions, but the relative astrometry is shown here as a placeholder pending further measures. WDS 01363+5044 = AG+50 184 On SDSS and 2MASS images a companion comes up strongly at longer wavelengths, suggesting it is a cool, late-type star, though the link is not definite. Since the primary is overexposed on the SDSS images, an estimate is made from them. WDS 01420-4213 = HD 10561 The companion is CD-42 587, which clearly shares common motion with the HD star. CCD photometry indicates these are both late-F dwarfs, in agreement with the HD type of G0 for primary, but contrary to Houk's admittedly uncertain types, K0/2: + A/F:, which are probably affected by the overlapping spectra. WDS 01432-5801 = HD 10720 = CF Hyi The Hipparcos AB pair is optical, since the component B has proper motion of only about 25 mas/year versus 240 mas/year for the primary. The new component C has clear common proper motion. This is the first of some two dozen new pairs in the present list resulting from examination of bright southern K-dwarf stars identified by Art Upgren et al (1972). WDS 01477-1246 = BD-13 321 This Upgren K dwarf has a faint companion for which only an estimate could be made. WDS 02028-4057 = HD 12617 Although only two recent measures are readily available, the common motion is clear from comparison of various images. WDS 02051-0159 = BD-02 356 This is a clear common-motion pair from DSS1/2 and 2MASS images. WDS 02116-1049 = TYC 5281-0710-1 These two stars appear in a photometric sequence by Demers et al (1993), whose B-V values indicate a pair of G dwarfs. WDS 02163+1013 = G 4- 8 This star from the Lowell proper motion survey seems to be partly resolved on POSS-I, and the companion shows little change in relative position since then. It is fairly close, so only an estimate is listed from 2MASS images. WDS 02345+5158 = HD 232676 The distant common-motion companion is AG+51 243. The UCAC3 dataset is very good in this instance, so is more-or-less definitive. In addition I show the GSC-ACT measurement as an intermediate-epoch placeholder. WDS 03172-2041 = HD 20492 The faint companion to this Upgren K dwarf is nicely resolved on 2MASS images, but not elsewhere. WDS 03186+0827 = G 79-25 Another pair from the Lowell proper motion survey, this is a candidate `nearby' star with an inferred distance of about 23pc. WDS 03347-4716 = CD-47 1087 = CPD-47 360 This is another `likely' case that needs another epoch to decide whether or not it has common motion. Photometry and spectra indicate the primary star is somewhat metal-poor. WDS 03379-0231 = HD 22584 The Hipparcos component B ought to be visible on various images, but is not. It is possible the data-reduction was confused by the obvious common-motion companion to the southwest, denoted component C here. WDS 03458+2309 AC = HD 23410 Component C is a new M-dwarf Pleiad, not identified in any previous survey of the cluster, even in the near-IR. The matching proper motion, both with the primary and with the general Pleiades motion, is clear from comparison of old and new images. The bright primary is a 7-day spectroscopic binary, so together with Struve's component B, there are at least four stars in the system. WDS 03587+5013 = HD 24776 The common-motion companion is BD+49 1074, and the two stars have an astrometric baseline extending over 100 years. WDS 04167+5337 = HD 26764 The faint red companion is visible on the DSS far-red, Sloan, and 2MASS images. The star may have been identified by Rob De Rosa et al (2011) but with incorrect position-angle; they give a separation of 13".5 in pa 147\deg from an observation in May 2002. If so, then the present measures provide a confirmation and correction. WDS 04202-0902 = BD-09 872 This Upgren K dwarf has an easy-to-spot common-motion companion. WDS 04258+0328 = [R78b] 280 The common motion of this pair is clear between POSS-I and recent images, but only the near-contemporaneous UCAC3 and 2MASS measures are available. WDS 04306-4400 = CD-44 1590 = CPD-44 492 The USNO-A2.0 measure is skewed because the faint secondary lies just off the diffraction spike of the primary on the Schmidt plates. Nevertheless, the substantial proper motion ensures this is a physical pair. WDS 04358+0053 AC = BD+00 790 The AB pair is by Baillaud; the third star is not so much fainter. Motions are small, so a physical link amongst any of the three is uncertain. WDS 04480-4154 = HD 30703 The AB components by Hussey are well-observed; a much fainter third common-motion companion is present on 2MASS images, from which I made estimates. It has been involved with a field star and the Schmidt-plate diffraction spikes, so was easy to overlook previously, particularly in machine-based catalogues. WDS 04496-4352 = HD 272456 The common motion of this pair is quite certain, and appears correctly in UCAC3. WDS 04519-4647 = HD 31242 This pair has received some astrophysical follow-up due to its x-ray detection, so there are spectral types for both stars. WDS 05096+2420 = HD 241063 This star is lopsided on DSS images and partially resolved in 2MASS images. It is a distant (100pc) Hipparcos star with large proper motion. WDS 05109-4721 = HD 273806 It is a bit surprising that this relatively equal common-motion pair has been overlooked. WDS 05119+3055 = HD 241341 This HDE star has a faint common-motion companion clearly visible from comparison of the POSS-I with recent images. WDS 05127+2354 = HD 241511 This is fairly subtle on available images since the companion is so faint. But the epoch difference between the POSS-II red, far-red, and 2MASS is sufficient to identify it. The system is another distant (65pc) Hipparcos target with large motion. WDS 05192+2256 = HD 242500 This K-dwarf star appears to have a white dwarf companion sharing common proper motion. All three sets of differential astrometry are less good than usual due to the large delta-mag, but are sufficient to show the linkage. WDS 06004-4229 = HD 41022 The fairly bright component B is CD-42 2277 = CPD-42 799. Additional measures exist besides those shown in the table. WDS 06051-3118 = SOPS IIIf-44 This one is much closer than I usually notice, but the two components are shown separately in the 2MASS catalogue --- perhaps not a great measure, however, so I give an estimate from the images as well. The coordinates are from GSC-ACT, and are for the `center-of-blob' rather than a specific star. WDS 06063-2754 = HD 41842 This is a relatively subtle one since the motion is small. However, the companion M dwarf has a spectral type that is consistent with it being a physical companion. The recent preliminary catalogue from the WISE spacecraft provides a useful extension to the astrometric baseline. WDS 06079+0813 = HD 41853 Another Upgren K dwarf with a faint M-dwarf companion. WDS 06136-3403 = SOPS IIIa-98 This is the first of several pairs aligned nearly N-S found among stars classified by Stock \& Wroblewski (1972) in an objective-prism survey of the southern sky. The overlapping spectra caused them to think the star was single but peculiar. WDS 06405-0331 AC = HD 47840 This is an optical trio that is somewhat mixed-up in older catalogues: the B component northeast was omitted from the AC2000, and has often been linked with the slightly fainter star lying due east, yielding an erroneous proper motion. The WDS has now been disambiguated for this group. WDS 06501-4431 = CD-44 2948 = CPD-44 1116 This K-dwarf primary has an early-M common-motion companion. The annual proper motion is 0".17, so even the 11-year baseline of the measures is enough to indicate a physical link. WDS 06504-4132 = CD-41 2609 = CPD-41 1125 Though the proper motion is small, this seems to be a physical pair. WDS 06562-4659 = HD 51743 The common motion of this pair is clear from the 110-year baseline of the measurements. WDS 06597-5034 = CD-50 2505 = CPD-50 1115 The late-type companion here comes up on the DSS far-red and 2MASS images. WDS 07089-4452 = CD-44 3166 = CPD-44 1297 The secondary of this very wide pair has delta-magnitude and J-K color consistent with it being a G-dwarf companion to the K-giant primary. The UCAC2 proper motions are also nearly identical. WDS 07190-4723 = CD-47 2968 = CPD-47 1253 The companion is CD-47 2969 = CPD-47 1254. The GSC-ACT measure is the mean from four overlapping plates on different dates. I show both the UCAC2 and UCAC3 results derived for epoch 2000.0 since they depend on a different mix of data: UCAC3 adopts SuperCOSMOS rather than USNO Schmidt plate-scans, but excludes the AC2000 observation for the secondary. WDS 07211-4125 = HD 57805 The AB pair by Rossiter has only a few observations. The fainter, more distant companion has somewhat uncertain measures, partly due to the catalogues weighting the AB pair in different ways. It has the right delta-mag and color to be a physical companion, so has a fair chance of being related. WDS 07285-4909 = HD 59659 The companion is CD-48 2972 = CPD-48 1185, whose common motion with the primary seems to have been overlooked. WDS 07319-4854 = CD-48 3010 = CPD-48 1200 The 100-year baseline assures the common motion for this pair, which I identified in the `Cape Faint' catalogue. WDS 07387-5717 = SOPS IIIc-67 This pair has modest common proper motion, and is another case where the N-S overlap of the spectral images caused Stock \& Wroblewski to flag it as peculiar (i.e., they did not recognize that it is double). WDS 07406-3925 = CD-39 3486 = CPD-39 1570 This pair have common motion and were reported to have H-alpha emission by MacConnell (1981). From 2MASS colors they appear to be K dwarfs. WDS 07548-6459 = SOPS IIIc-108 Another Stock \& Wroblewski N-S pair with clear common motion. WDS 07552-4353 = HD 65092 The large delta-mag for the closer AB pair means only the 2MASS observation is available. The more distant and much brighter component C (CD-43 3726) has a complete astrometric history, and spectral type by Annie Cannon in the `Cape Faint' catalogue. WDS 07577+8548 = BD+86 106 Petersson's spectral type is probably for the combined light of the pair. WDS 08057-5925 = CD-59 1828 A clear common-motion pair first measured by Rousseau et al (1996) on ESO 1-m Schmidt `Quick Blue Survey' plates, but with several additional measures since then. WDS 08108-4852 = CD-48 3568 = CPD-48 1537 This lies in the vicinity of the open cluster NGC 2547, though its membership in the cluster is uncertain. The Jeffries et al (2004) data were taken using the CTIO 0.9-m telescope and CCD. WDS 08158-1027 = HD 69247 This close Rossiter pair has a more distant common-motion companion. WDS 08300-4604 = CD-45 4187 = CPD-45 2580 Component B is CD-45 4188 = CPD-45 2581. The 95-year baseline of measurements secures the physical link of this pair of F-type dwarfs. WDS 08367+2946 = CHSS 504 This is the first of several pairs noted while working over a star-list by Warren Brown et al (2003), consisting of stars in northern high-latitude fields. They are denoted here by the acronym `CHSS'. All are moderately-faint undistinguished pairs led by F- to K-type dwarfs. The long baseline available for this wider pair indicates common motion. WDS 08439-2521 = Ruiz 496-291 This is a faint southern white-dwarf/M-dwarf pair reported by Maria Teresa Ruiz and Pierre Bergeron (2001). Since the degenerate star is so much fainter, I leave it as the secondary, even though it is the more massive component (and once upon a time, also the brighter star!). WDS 08445-4200 = CD-41 4442 = CPD-41 2900 The blue companion has 2MASS J-K = 0.20, suggesting an early F-type star, about right for the delta-magnitude. WDS 08460+8407 = BD+84 183 UCAC3 includes about a dozen recent observations for both stars, probably from image-overlaps at the high northern Declination, so the derived measure should be very good. This is confirmed by a very far-north SDSS scan. WDS 08503+1057 = NLTT 20346 This faint M dwarf was resolved by Faherty et al (2011), who also provided the spectral types. Comparison of images at various epochs shows the common proper motion. WDS 08588-6115 = HD 77307 This young star (strong lithium, x-ray source) has two fairly close companions. Colors are reasonably consistent with their being physical, but proper motions are small, and there are no radial velocities. WDS 08590+1156 = HK Cnc This B-type subdwarf has two red companions that are about as much fainter as you'd expect M dwarfs to be relative to the hot subdwarf. Folks have looked without success specifically for red companions to this star both spectroscopically in far-red and photometrically in the near-IR. WDS 08593-4730 = [SR88] 17027 The UCAC3 proper motions may be problematic, so the separation and position-angle may not be strictly correct, but okay as a placeholder until further measures can be made. WDS 09000+2938 = CHSS 557 WDS 09133-0219 AD = BD-01 2219 Components B and C, attributed to John Herschel, are both optical. Inspection of SDSS and 2MASS images shows the K-dwarf primary is a fairly close equal pair with common proper motion. WDS 09181-5746 = HD 80545 The faint, close companion is readily visible on 2MASS images, but not included in any catalogues, despite the primary having received some study as a high-proper-motion star. This is a `nearby' star with a revised Hipparcos parallax placing it at 23pc. WDS 09280-6606 = HD 82282 Only the 2MASS measure is available for this pair. WDS 09287-0827 = BD-07 2815 The primary here was picked up as a K dwarf both by Upgren et al and later by Stephenson (1986b). WDS 09319+3430 = Es 299 BC This close pair by Espin is not present at the location given in the WDS. However, the star nevertheless has a faint companion that seems to share common motion. This pair is not related to component A, whose proper motion is significantly different. WDS 09452+4109 = BD+41 2002 The very close Aa,Ab pair here was discovered by Couteau, subsequently confirmed by Hipparcos and speckle observations. Components B and C are more distant and have a modest chance of being physical. There is only the single measure of AB, but it is more likely to be physical. Component C seems to be fixed over 20 years, but the proper motions are small, so radial-velocities or other information is required. The pair ADS 7506, measured by Aitken in 1910, actually belongs to BD+41 2004, about 5' southeast, and is thus the same pair measured by Barnard and also known as ADS 7507. This mix-up has been corrected in the WDS. WDS 09483-7345 = CPD-73 654 Another N-S pair identified as a single peculiar star by Stock \& Wroblewski, but which seems to be a common-motion pair. WDS 10086-7353 = CPD-73 689 This Stock \& Wroblewski pair also shows parallel motion in UCAC2, confirmed by the differential measures here. WDS 10117-6854 = CPD-68 1050 Component B is CPD-68 1051. This is another overlapping pair called `peculiar' by Stock \& Wroblewski. The photometric colors suggest a pair of ordinary F stars. WDS 10208+5836 = HD 89413 I show new faint companions to both A and B here. Based on the delta-magnitude and photometric colors, component D seems likely to be an M-dwarf companion to A. Component E has neutral color, so the connection with star B is not obvious. It seems to be fixed at least between POSS-I and recent images, but the motions are small for both of the bright stars. WDS 10224-2851 = HD 89965 The large delta-mag here means the red companion does not appear except in the near-infrared DENIS and 2MASS catalogues. WDS 10317-3840 = CD-38 6535 = CPD-38 4188 This pair was reported as double by Upgren et al as their stars UGP 236 and 237. WDS 10366+7849 = hj 5480 Component B of this wide optical pair is double on SDSS and 2MASS images. There has been no substantial change in position-angle between POSS-I and recent images. WDS 10379+4407 BE = BD+44 2004 B Component B of this group shares common motion with the primary; stars C and D are optical. The B star is itself a closer pair resolved on two nights in the SDSS catalogue. WDS 11078-3421 = SOPS IVf-23 This nearby large-motion white-dwarf/M-dwarf pair was identified by Subasavage et al (2007), though the white dwarf primary was recognized much earlier by Stock \& Wroblewski. It evidently lies not far outside the 25pc `nearby' radius. The coordinates are from the Yale Southern Proper Motion Survey. WDS 11104+8347 = BD+84 249 Another wide northern common-motion pair. UCAC3 includes Hamburg astrograph plates at an intermediate epoch as well as the AC2000, Tycho-2, and UCAC astrograph data, so its proper motions have high weight. WDS 11391-2742 = CD-26 8683 = CPD-26 4555 Another difficult companion for which I show only an estimate from 2MASS images. WDS 12178-3904 = CD-38 7621 This is a large-proper-motion M-dwarf pair at about 31pc distance. The companion is visible on the DSS images, so the common motion is obvious, but resolved only in 2MASS. WDS 12208-1954 = HD 107388 The companion here is visible on POSS-I/II, but well resolved only in the 2MASS catalogue. WDS 12208+2906 = CHSS 853 WDS 12279+2931 = CHSS 238 WDS 12380+8328 = BD+84 283 The companion is AG+83 322. Petersson classified both stars, and they were also recorded separately in the AGK2, whose epoch measure I show here (corrected for precession). WDS 12556+2933 = CHSS 286 WDS 13016+2924 = CHSS 298 WDS 13136+3013 = BD+30 2381 The companion is BD+30 2380, which is itself the northwestern star of a 20" optical pair. WDS 13352+5039 = StM 185 This was reported by Stephenson (1986a) as a (single) late-M giant, but it is actually a pair of common-motion dwarfs. Stephenson's spectral type is M8, but the V-K color suggests something like M2 or M3 as a dwarf (and even earlier as a giant). The implied distance is perhaps 35pc. WDS 13375+1257 = HD 118558 This mainly confirms a correctly-reduced UCAC3 pair with its double-star flags set. The UCAC3 motions are also correct. WDS 13449-4535 = CD-44 8852 = LTT 5330 Another easy one, evidently overlooked by Luyten, though he may have only cribbed the old `Cape Faint' catalogue for the motion of the primary, and the companion was too faint to appear on his blue-sensitive plates. The companion does appear in UCAC3 and antecedents, but there doesn't seem to be anything else in VizieR or SIMBAD. Stock \& Wroblewski call this spectral type `S', which is wrong, since there are no dwarfs among such stars. The 2MASS J-K = 0.82 for primary, suggesting an M0 dwarf --- putting it at about 30pc. The WISE astrometry doubles the modest astrometric baseline for this pair. WDS 13457+0128 = BD+02 2719 The SDSS images have the primary saturated, of course, while the 2MASS images are merely poorly resolved, so perhaps all three measures are rather uncertain. WDS 13472-4640 = CD-46 8854 = CPD-46 6490 These don't seem to have moved much relative to each other since 1904 despite 3".5 of sky motion. WDS 14016+0133 AE = tau Vir Component E, revealed on SDSS and 2MASS images, appears to be an M-dwarf companion to the bright naked-eye primary. It is possible that this is the same star reported by De Rosa et al (2011), but with an incorrect position-angle. WDS 14201-1104 = HD 125522 The common motion of this one is obvious from comparison of the POSS-I plate-scans with later images. WDS 14232-0807 = BD-07 3837 The primary is a well-known motion star going back to Frank Ross, but the very faint companion appears only on recent UK Schmidt and 2MASS/DENIS images. The epoch difference among these is sufficient to show the common proper motion. WDS 14389-4310 = CD-42 9515 The ROSAT detection indicates a young T Tauri star for the primary, and these often have companions, which was easily spotted here on images and in catalogues, despite the modest motion. The companion has 2MASS J-K color consistent with an M dwarf. WDS 15003-1632 = HD 132569 The companion to this Upgren et al K dwarf lacks direct evidence of common motion, but the red color of the companion makes it likely. WDS 15091+5904 = StM 219 This Stephenson late-M star was given as type M7, but has been observed more recently to be a pair of dwarfs of early-M type. WDS 15158-2609 = SOPS IVa-19 The overlapping spectra of this pair were misinterpreted as a (single) supergiant by Stock \& Wroblewski. WDS 15265-0115 = UGP 378 A little fainter than the limits of the classical catalogues, so there is no HD or BD name. The pair was recorded in the Sloan survey on two dates. WDS 15445+4910 = FBS 1542+493 In the recent list of red stars from the First Byurakan Survey (Gigoyan et al 2010), I noticed this nearly-equal small-proper-motion binary. Though only oval on DSS/2MASS images, they are clearly resolved in all SDSS images, but not in the object catalogue. The Gigoyan et al spectral type is M6/7, which may not be too late if the 2MASS colors are also correct. The SDSS colors suggest the type is between M4 and M5, in which case the pair are at about 25pc. WDS 15468-0515 = BD-04 3974 A good common-motion pair resolved in three modern astrometric catalogues. WDS 16037-5402 = CPD-53 6997 = CD-53 6376 DePew et al (2011) note that this new Wolf-Rayet star leads a trio immersed in a nebula, which has been variously listed as a reflection object or a candidate planetary nebula. The two companions are almost certainly related, and are perhaps the brightest of a cluster. The 2MASS K-band image shows that component C is a closer pair, which I omit for now. The Sydney Astrographic Catalogue plate measurements are by Fresneau et al (2005, 2007), whose co-authors include the Double Star Section leader. WDS 16127-1319 = BPM 78313 Another nice one, easy to spot comparing the POSS-I and UK Schmidt scans. The primary was logged decades ago as a motion star by Luyten (1963) in his Bruce Proper Motion survey, but the companion has been overlooked heretofore. WDS 16470-7727 = SOPS If-28 This Stock \& Wroblewski object is a matched pair in color and magnitude. It is a little too faint to appear in the Cape or Cordoba Durchmusterungen. The slightly fainter northern component is listed in Tycho-2. WDS 16496-5841 = WT 529 This is the first of a series of common-motion pairs found among southern proper-motion stars listed by Wroblewski \& Torres (1994). This example is typical in that the primary is a late-K or early-M dwarf. WDS 16573-6155 = LTT 6751 + WT 531 Luyten noticed the motion of the primary, but the common-motion companion was probably too faint for his plates, and was picked up by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 17058-6325 = WT 535 There is no obvious change in orientation between earliest DSS plates-scans and 2MASS images. WDS 17104+2759 = StM 336 The last of the Stephenson late-M stars that turns out to be binary is a widely separated pair of dwarfs. As a result, early astrometry clinches the physical link. A rather complete dataset is shown in the table, extending to the WISE observation in 2010. WDS 17181-0117 = HD 156517 The common motion is easy to see from comparison of POSS-I and later images. WDS 17193-2949 = LP 920-40 This large-proper-motion pair of M dwarfs is projected on a dense star-field near the galactic center. The primary (only) was recorded by Luyten, but the pair were discovered by Terzan et al (1980), who published UBV photometry for both stars (Terzan \& Bernard 1981); and more recently by Lepine et al (2002). The latter paper mentions a third component, but this is clearly a zero-motion field star. Since the motion is over 0".5/year, even the 5-year baseline of the present measures is enough to show they're linked. This is more obvious from comparison of the POSS-I plates and recent images. WDS 17203-3012 = NLTT 44585 + 44586 Another pair picked up first by Luyten and again by Terzan and by Lepine. WDS 17349+8313 = AC+83 2408 + 2407 This pair is identified by its BD-like zone numbers in the Greenwich zone of the Astrographic Catalogue, from which the 1899 measure is derived. Petersson gave the combined spectral type for the pair. WDS 17375-6634 = NLTT 112-52 This is a surprising one (that it's not already catalogued), given the large motion and HIP entry --- though not actually observed by the spacecraft. The UCAC3 measure for AB is only a placeholder: no motion is given for the secondary, and the motion of the primary is wrong. UCAC3 is likewise problematic for the third star. The USNO-B1.0 motion looks to be about right: -70, -468 mas/year in RA and Dec, respectively. The trio are all early-M dwarfs, and estimates of their distance derived from the magnitudes and photometric colors suggest the system lies in the range of 25pc. They are thus fair candidates for new `nearby' stars. SIMBAD is surprisingly silent on the stars, and not much besides the astrometry is shown in VizieR. They need `real' data including spectra and parallaxes! WDS 17532-4650 = SOPS IIg-15 This Stock \& Wroblewski star is another N-S pair with common motion. It is too faint to appear in the classical Cape and Cordoba catalogues or in Tycho-2. The 2MASS J-K colors suggest a pair of G dwarfs. WDS 18346-3338 = CD-33 13354 Stock \& Wroblewski claim this is a T Tauri-type star, but the colors are too blue, and they have not been found as emission-line K stars in other surveys. The error was almost certainly caused by the overlapping spectra of the unrecognized double. WDS 18391-6523 = WT 574 The primary is L 113-10, which is not in the CD or CPD; the unrelated star about 36" southeast is CPD-65 3745 = CD-65 2497. The Astrographic Catalogue and Tycho-2 astrometry for the primary is misattributed in UCAC3 to the faint companion. WDS 18437-0413 = BD-04 4564 Superposed on the Scutum starcloud, this appears to be a common-motion pair having a G-dwarf primary. WDS 18493-5354 = LTT 7451 + WT 593 Another case where Wroblewski \& Torres have added a common-motion companion to a known large-motion star. There is no obvious change in orientation between earliest DSS plate-scans and 2MASS images. WDS 18569-2910 = CD-29 15541 This pair clearly have common motion. The two stars were reported previously by Rousseau et al, though their measure is poor (near the resolution limit of the Schmidt plates), and omitted here. WDS 18576-6321 = WT 608 + 609 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 18596-5529 = WT 612 The coordinates for the primary are from the PPMXL catalogue of R\"oser et al (2010). Common motion is obvious from comparison of images at various epochs, but only GSC-2.3 has good measurements for both stars. The stars are quite blue, possibly two fairly cool white dwarfs, and so are absent from 2MASS. WDS 19015-5840 = WT 616 Both stars are M dwarfs. WDS 19150-6239 = WT 639 + 640 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 19459-3521 = CD-35 13680 = CPD-35 8641 This one is clear from the modest common motion apparent amongst the DSS/2MASS images. Also reported by Rousseau et al, but their relative coordinates are poor (7".3 separation). Stock \& Wroblewski listed this as a (single) weak-lined K star, but the 2MASS colors indicate ordinary dwarfs near K0. WDS 19578-2132 AC = BD-21 5582 The WDS description of AB does not apply to anything in the near field, so there is probably some identification error. However, the 2MASS images show a red star closer to the northwest that is not present at the 2MASS location on the POSS-I plates, where the primary is well offset due to its proper motion. Only an estimate is available for this companion. WDS 20031-0617 = HD 189987 This is another case where there is no direct evidence of common motion, but the color of the companion is consistent with an M dwarf together with the K-dwarf primary. WDS 20126-0904 = UGP 491 The primary was also classified as type K4/5 by Stephenson (1986b). WDS 20162+5126 = BD+50 3041 This pair is the first of a series in the region of the `Northern Coalsack' stretching across northernmost Cygnus. The area was the subject of an early, good-quality objective-prism spectral study by Erik Van\"as (1939) involving nearly 2000 stars. Though the spectral types shown come from this dissertation, Van\"as did not identify any of the pairs. The companion here is BD+51 2810, which seems not to be a duplicate entry for the primary from the adjacent BD zone despite the small separation vis-a-vis the BD catalogue. The UCAC3 measure includes astrograph data at two intermediate epochs, so the common proper motion seems secure. WDS 20217-5000 = HD 193307 The companion to this naked-eye star is WT 703, noticed by Wroblewski \& Torres, but also measured by Rousseau et al. Thanks to the large motion and 35-year baseline of the measures, the physical link is quite certain. The primary appears in catalogues of stars closer than 25pc, but the revised Hipparcos parallax puts it at about 31pc. WDS 20283-5519 = WT 710 = NLTT 210-28 Luyten's coordinates are poor, so Wroblewski \& Torres identified the star as new (and single). It is oval on DSS and 2MASS images; my estimates of separation and position-angle are from the latter. WDS 20384+5248 AB = BD+52 2767 The primary is an unconfirmed Tycho double star. The somewhat fainter companion about 20" south appears to have common motion per UCAC3, and also color just slightly redder, consistent with being a physical companion. Somewhat surprisingly, the fainter star is not in the Astrographic Catalogue. The UCAC3 coords/motion are probably preferred here since there are several intermediate catalogues included; Tycho-2 omits the motion for the secondary. WDS 20452-6902 = WT 730 + 729 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 21011-4907 = WT 766 + 765 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 21014-5019 = WT 767 + 768 This pair of relatively bright M dwarfs was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 21144+5015 = BD+49 3484 The common-motion companion is BD+49 3483. The UCAC3 measure includes the early Astrographic Catalogue and intermediate-epoch astrograph data, and thus is more-or-less definitive. I show the GSC-ACT measure as one of several other datasets that are not included in UCAC3. WDS 21178+5229 = HD 203046 There has been about 4" of sky motion since the year 1900, so the fixed orientation argues for a common-motion pair. The delta-mag and colors for the secondary are consistent with it being a late-G dwarf. WDS 21200+5436 AB = BD+53 2603 This close (confirmed) Tycho double star has a distant, similarly-bright companion with common motion that's been overlooked heretofore. Van\"as classified both of the wide components. WDS 21235+8417 = BD+83 612 This pair is flagged in UCAC3 as double, but inspection of various images shows it is an optical pair. The POSS-I images, especially, show the position-angle at about 170 deg, consistent with its epoch halfway between the ones shown in the table. WDS 21394+5255 = BD+52 3004 This wide, nearly matched pair seems to show common motion, and the 2MASS J-K colors are consistent with it being physical. The Van\"as spectral type is surely for the combined light. WDS 21403+0516 = [R78b] 522 The 1953 measure from POSS-I for this modest-motion system assures the physical link. WDS 21473-4034 = WT 813 Despite the small baseline of the measures, the common proper motion is clear from various images. WDS 21519-4325 = WT 823 + 824 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 21573-3418 = CD-34 15340 = CPD-34 9028 The close AB pair is an Hipparcos discovery. For the more distant component C, I examined the USNO-Flagstaff pixel-server scan of the `Whiteoak extension' plate (epoch 1964.7), which suggests the common motion more strongly by comparison with more recent images. Alas, there is no star catalogue from the Whiteoak plates. WDS 22020-4955 = WT 858 The two measures are somewhat discordant because they are near the resolution limits of the respective catalogues. WDS 22199-3717 = HD 211723 This companion comes up on the far-red DSS and 2MASS images; the common motion is clear. WDS 22320-4515 = WT 940 Reported as single by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 22374-4550 = WT 946 = CD-46 14373 = CPD-46 10424 The older Rousseau measure is somewhat discrepant, but given to show that the common-motion link is clear. WDS 23097-4223 = WT 966 = CD-43 15280 The spectral type for the primary is by Annie Cannon and comes from the 1939 `Cape Faint' catalogue. WDS 23105-4109 = WT 968 The 2MASS J-K color suggests the primary is a mid-K dwarf. WDS 23176-4212 = HD 219630 Although the primary was listed by Luyten as a large motion star, he seems to have overlooked the companion, which is not very faint. WDS 23289-5428 = WT 995 + 996 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. It lies very near, but is not related to HD 221019. WDS 23460-5621 = WT 1025 + 1024 This pair was newly identified by Wroblewski \& Torres. WDS 23553-3155 = HD 224113 + HD 224112 These two naked-eye stars are members of the high-latitude $\zeta$ Scl open cluster, also known as Blanco 1, so it is not surprising that the proper motions match. The primary is also AL Scl, a double-lined eclipsing binary. I was able to locate two very early measurements: from Lacaille's transit observations of 1751 using a half-inch telescope (Henderson 1847), and in the {\it Argentine General Catalogue} (Gould 1886). Both measures are precessed to J2000, and agree well with modern observations, given the methods involved. The recent AKARI spacecraft detection extends the temporal baseline to over 250 years. ******************************************************************************* Name RA (J2000) Dec s Va Vb spec epoch theta rho aper meth source WDS 00065-4911 0 06 27.33 -49 10 55.9 T 10.1 10.9 K0 1904.241 86.1 10.50 13 G AC2000 1998.78 86.0 10.34 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.0 85.9 10.29 8 E UCAC3 2000.564 86.1 10.31 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00101+3825 DB 0 10 05.25 +38 24 53.8 U 10.7 16.0 K8 1998.932 295.3 4.14 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00101+8529 0 10 06.95 +85 28 33.7 T 11.0 11.6 F5 1900.745 274.3 16.77 13 G AC2000 1983.76 273.6 16.59 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1991.25 273.9 16.77 11 T Tycho-2 1999.797 273.7 16.62 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 274.1 16.62 16 Qwi WISE WDS 00175-4726 0 17 30.25 -47 26 00.3 U 11.3 16.0 K 1996.69 85.9 7.53 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 1999.723 85.7 7.61 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 00391-2533 0 39 05.81 -25 32 59.8 U 11.4 11.8 G: 1910.366 106.0 6.52 13 G AC2000 1989.740 109.1 8.48 48 G GSC-2.3 1996.624 106.9 7.63 40 Ede DENIS 1998.857 107.0 7.61 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 106.8 7.64 8 E UCAC2 2004.786 106.8 7.60 7 M CMC14 WDS 01151-4707 1 15 04.46 -47 06 54.6 U 11.5 12.5 K0 2000.0 29.4 2.85 8 E UCAC3 WDS 01363+5044 1 36 19.51 +50 43 35.5 U 10.7 18.0 K 1994.235 38. 2.0 100 Esd SDSS DR7 estimate WDS 01420-4213 1 42 02.99 -42 13 09.5 U 10.3 10.9 G0 1900.436 2.4 47.37 13 G AC2000 1996.602 2.4 47.51 40 Ede DENIS 1998.920 2.4 47.54 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 2.5 47.53 8 E UCAC2 WDS 01432-5801 AC 1 43 11.06 -58 00 36.4 T 9.3 15.7 K2V 1998.882 102.5 25.44 40 Ede DENIS 1999.816 102.5 25.25 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 102.7 25.32 8 E UCAC3 WDS 01477-1246 1 47 43.36 -12 46 14.4 U 9.8 15.0 K5V 1998.531 228. 3.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 02028-4057 2 02 45.05 -40 57 03.1 U 9.0 15.2 K3V 1998.687 66.3 36.22 40 Ede DENIS 1999.597 66.6 36.07 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 02051-0159 2 05 05.15 -01 58 56.2 U 9.8 16.1 G5: 1997.072 207.1 10.15 100 Esd SDSS DR8 1997.951 206.2 9.96 100 Esd SDSS DR8 1998.742 207.6 9.95 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.682 206.6 9.93 7 M CMC14 WDS 02116-1049 2 11 34.98 -10 49 08.6 M 11.6 12.3 G: 1995.122 75.5 4.90 100 Esd SDSS DR8 2000.0 75.5 4.54 8 E UCAC3 2000.797 76.1 4.57 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 02163+1013 2 16 16.28 +10 13 11.4 L 14.2 17.0 M3? 2000.739 116. 3.1 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 02345+5158 2 34 30.50 +51 58 19.2 U 9.3 10.3 F2 G0 1903.438 45.0 77.45 13 G AC2000 1983.776 44.8 77.58 48 G GSC-ACT 2000.0 44.9 77.59 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 44.9 77.61 16 Qwi WISE WDS 03172-2041 3 17 14.87 -20 41 08.9 U 9.7 15.0 K3V 1998.884 50.2 5.48 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 03186+0827 3 18 38.60 +08 27 06.7 L 13.3 14.5 M3V 1999.934 355.7 5.75 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.808 355.9 5.45 7 M CMC14 WDS 03347-4716 3 34 44.47 -47 16 12.1 U 10.3 14.0 G0 1975.35 205.1 6.50 40 G Rousseau 1999.646 202.0 6.55 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 03379-0231 AC 3 37 54.39 -02 30 42.0 T 9.6 12.9 K2V 1998.728 205.0 13.60 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.950 205.2 13.57 40 Ede DENIS 2000.717 205.1 13.48 7 M CMC14 2010.5 205.0 13.46 16 Qwi WISE WDS 03458+2309 AC 3 45 48.82 +23 08 49.7 T 6.9 16.5 A0V 1998.857 152.9 16.51 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.880 152.5 16.43 51 E2m 2MASS 6x WDS 03587+5013 3 58 42.39 +50 12 58.7 U 9.2 9.7 F0 G0 1904.171 137.1 32.82 13 G AC2000 1999.780 137.0 32.71 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 137.1 32.75 8 E UCAC3 2004.790 137.0 32.70 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2005.844 137.2 32.79 100 Esd SDSS DR8 2010.5 137.0 32.79 16 Qwi WISE WDS 04167+5337 4 16 43.09 +53 36 42.5 T 5.2 15.5 A1Vn 1999.140 115.9 13.71 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.948 116.1 13.72 100 Esd 2MASS minus SDSS DR7 WDS 04202-0902 4 20 14.24 -09 02 13.5 U 9.8 15.5 K4V 1982.816 300.3 17.96 48 G GSC-ACT 1998.947 300.3 18.21 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.972 300.2 18.08 7 M CMC14 2010.5 299.8 18.09 16 Qwi WISE WDS 04258+0328 4 25 45.15 +03 27 48.9 U 13.4 14.8 M2:V 2000.068 106.1 4.43 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.4 105.9 4.26 8 E UCAC3 mean epoch WDS 04306-4400 4 30 33.35 -44 00 03.7 U 10.1 16.7 K 1983.370 350.5 18.16 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.917 349.2 18.74 40 Ede DENIS 1999.739 349.4 18.72 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 349.0 18.97 16 Qwi WISE WDS 04358+0053 AC 4 35 43.43 +00 53 40.2 U 10.7 13.8 K: 1983.774 102.3 19.79 48 G GSC-ACT 1995.852 103.1 19.96 8 M ACR 1999.986 102.0 20.02 7 M CMC14 2000.0 101.9 20.06 8 E UCAC2 2000.074 102.0 20.09 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 04480-4154 AC 4 47 59.86 -41 53 32.8 U 9.3 16.0 K3V 1998.986 6. 16.0 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 04496-4352 4 49 33.57 -43 51 33.8 U 10.3 16.1 K0 1996.00 156.7 16.76 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 1999.775 156.7 16.66 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 156.8 16.67 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 156.7 16.69 16 Qwi WISE WDS 04519-4647 4 51 53.54 -46 47 13.3 U 9.7 12.9 G5V M0Ve 1902.8 195.6 18.16 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1975.909 194.3 18.24 48 G GSC-ACT 1996.934 196.6 18.40 40 Ede DENIS 1999.720 196.5 18.28 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 196.6 18.43 8 E UCAC2 2010.5 196.5 18.40 16 Qwi WISE WDS 05096+2420 5 09 34.68 +24 19 31.1 U 10.3 14.0 K2 1997.923 280. 2.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 05109-4721 5 10 55.17 -47 21 21.9 U 10.2 11.5 F5 1902.943 17.9 9.33 13 G AC2000 1998.298 18.4 9.05 40 Ede DENIS 1999.775 18.1 9.14 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 18.2 9.06 8 E UCAC2 WDS 05119+3055 5 11 51.78 +30 54 44.9 U 10.8 18.2 K0 1955.807 118.5 28.76 48 G USNO-A2.0 1999.907 118.5 28.93 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.6 118.0 28.69 7 M CMC14 mean epoch 2010.5 118.4 28.80 16 Qwi WISE WDS 05127+2354 5 12 42.01 +23 53 35.8 U 10.3 19.0 K 2000.854 119.8 8.94 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 05192+2256 5 19 12.58 +22 56 18.9 U 10.6 16.8 K0 WD: 1951.985 45.6 13.1 48 G POSS-I estimate 1997.843 46.1 12.63 51 E2m 2MASS, uncertain 2001.879 46.3 12.80 7 M CMC14 WDS 06004-4229 6 00 26.57 -42 28 31.5 U 9.2 10.2 F6/7V G5 1903.612 20.9 73.12 13 G AC2000 1962.05 21.0 73.18 8 G CPC2 1976.879 21.6 73.35 48 G GSC-ACT 1979.004 21.6 73.41 48 G GSC-ACT 1996.096 21.1 73.05 40 Ede DENIS 1998.912 20.9 73.01 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 21.0 73.18 8 E UCAC2 2010.5 20.9 73.01 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06051-3118 6 05 06.2 -31 17 35 G 13.9 14.9 A/F 1999.750 20.4 1.25 51 E2m 2MASS catalogue 1999.750 28. 2.1 51 E2m 2MASS image estimate WDS 06063-2754 6 06 16.62 -27 54 21.0 U 8.9 14.0 K2V M3e 1981.023 33.5 19.19 48 G GSC-ACT 1996.044 34.8 19.07 40 Ede DENIS 1999.041 34.1 19.25 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.058 33.9 19.15 40 Ede DENIS 2010.5 34.2 19.21 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06079+0813 6 07 52.30 +08 13 10.3 U 9.0 15.3 K2V 2000.025 136.3 8.02 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 06136-3403 6 13 38.47 -34 03 17.5 U 13.0 14.1 F0 1978.5 8.7 19.08 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1994.997 8.4 19.26 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.290 8.9 19.27 40 Ede DENIS 1999.800 8.6 19.24 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 8.9 19.26 8 E UCAC2 2010.5 9.0 19.23 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06405-0331 AC 6 40 29.98 -03 31 28.2 U 8.7 11.0 F2/3 K0III 1894.19 89.5 14.93 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1998.257 83.5 18.94 40 Ede DENIS 1998.802 83.4 19.02 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 82.7 19.54 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06501-4431 6 50 06.66 -44 31 01.4 U 9.7 12.6 K2 1999.255 255.4 33.57 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.101 255.4 33.71 40 Ede DENIS 2010.5 255.4 33.70 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06504-4132 6 50 25.74 -41 31 46.6 U 10.3 12.1 G5 1902.2 354.7 11.48 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1998.307 354.9 11.48 40 Ede DENIS 1999.123 354.9 11.53 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 354.7 11.49 8 E UCAC2 2000.101 354.8 11.46 40 Ede DENIS 2010.5 355.0 11.53 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06562-4659 6 56 14.55 -46 59 17.7 U 9.8 12.4 G3V 1899.954 80.3 22.32 13 G AC2000 1976.909 81.9 22.09 48 G GSC-ACT 1980.119 79.9 22.21 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.255 78.9 22.16 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 78.5 22.21 8 E UCAC2 2010.5 78.8 22.22 16 Qwi WISE WDS 06597-5034 6 59 44.83 -50 33 49.4 U 10.0 16.0 G5 1999.882 215.8 4.48 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07089-4452 7 08 52.86 -44 51 42.5 U 10.0 14.5 K0 1980.119 194.1 100.66 48 G GSC-ACT 1980.601 194.1 101.06 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.35 194.1 100.62 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 1999.266 194.3 100.73 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 194.2 100.65 8 E UCAC2 2010.5 194.1 100.59 16 Qwi WISE WDS 07190-4723 7 18 58.28 -47 23 29.7 U 10.4 11.9 F5 1904.192 84.1 45.23 13 G AC2000 1978.3 84.0 44.94 48 G GSC-ACT,n=4 1980.142 83.9 45.07 48 G USNO-A2.0 1996.115 84.1 45.00 40 Ede DENIS 1999.236 83.9 45.11 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 83.9 45.08 8 E UCAC2 2000.0 83.9 45.12 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 84.2 45.10 16 Qwi WISE WDS 07211-4125 AB,C 7 21 03.52 -41 24 45.6 U 10.1 13.5 F3/5V 1976.16 207.6 9.39 40 G Rousseau 1996.044 203.4 9.08 40 Ede DENIS 1999.967 211.4 8.82 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 209.2 8.84 8 E UCAC3 WDS 07285-4909 7 28 30.06 -49 08 58.9 U 8.8 9.9 F7V G8V 1901.248 285.3 81.76 13 G AC2000 1978.015 285.1 81.30 48 G GSC-ACT 1997.192 285.1 81.57 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 285.1 81.66 8 E UCAC2 2000.038 285.0 81.64 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07319-4854 7 31 53.08 -48 53 44.4 U 9.9 12.8 F2 1900.490 2.7 7.77 13 G AC2000 1997.060 1.7 7.79 40 Ede DENIS 1998.359 1.2 7.79 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 1.2 7.83 8 E UCAC2 2000.038 0.8 7.76 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07387-5717 7 38 42.08 -57 17 12.8 U 11.8 12.6 F 1898.0 1.4 11.51 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1974.97 359.6 12.56 40 G Rousseau 1996.060 0.3 12.23 40 Ede DENIS 1998.909 0.3 12.26 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 0.4 12.29 8 E UCAC2 2001.123 0.3 12.29 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07406-3925 7 40 37.94 -39 24 58.1 U 10.0 13.2 K: 1999.112 31.5 8.35 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.945 32.0 8.17 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 32.0 8.17 8 E UCAC3 WDS 07548-6459 7 54 48.45 -64 58 32.0 U 11.7 12.3 F 1911.5 350.2 16.60 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1975.93 350.3 16.73 40 G Rousseau 1996.085 351.7 16.63 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 351.6 16.63 8 E UCAC2 2000.016 351.6 16.57 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07552-4353 AB 7 55 11.10 -43 52 32.8 U 8.6 14.0 A3III 1999.268 135.3 5.26 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 07552-4353 AC 8.6 9.6 A3III F0 1901.149 330.5 54.68 13 G AC2000 1962.08 330.6 54.86 8 G CPC2 1976.07 330.3 54.91 40 G Rousseau 1976.906 330.4 54.92 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.137 330.6 54.66 40 Ede DENIS 1999.268 330.6 54.84 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 330.6 54.80 8 E UCAC2 WDS 07577+8548 7 57 42.85 +85 47 49.8 T 11.4 12.0 F5 1900.539 256.6 5.56 13 G AC2000 1999.893 261.0 5.80 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 260.1 5.76 8 E UCAC3 WDS 08057-5925 8 05 40.04 -59 25 26.0 U 10.4 12.0 K6V 1975.210 228.8 19.54 40 G Rousseau 1977.218 228.6 19.91 48 G GSC-ACT 1998.424 229.0 19.78 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 228.9 19.77 8 E UCAC2 2000.085 229.1 19.81 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 08108-4852 8 10 46.72 -48 52 00.0 U 10.5 13.5 F5 1902.7 91.2 8.46 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1998.452 93.0 8.32 40 Ede DENIS 1999.039 93.3 8.26 36 F Jeffries et al 2004 1999.901 92.7 8.29 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 92.8 8.30 8 E UCAC2 WDS 08158-1027 AB,C 8 15 45.12 -10 26 54.4 U 9.3 15.9 K5V 1955.881 142.8 26.97 48 G USNO-A2.0 1999.016 142.5 26.82 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.274 142.5 26.72 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 142.5 26.76 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 142.4 26.84 16 Qwi WISE WDS 08300-4604 8 29 58.07 -46 03 48.1 U 10.0 10.7 F2 1904.711 53.9 38.81 13 G AC2000 1976.07 53.9 38.39 40 G Rousseau 1977.046 53.6 38.80 48 G GSC-ACT 1978.130 54.0 38.68 48 G USNO-A2.0 1999.244 54.1 38.69 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 53.9 38.74 8 E UCAC2 WDS 08367+2946 8 36 40.06 +29 45 40.3 U 13.7 13.8 F4 1953.940 269.6 14.32 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.037 269.6 14.36 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1998.090 269.4 14.41 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 269.5 14.40 8 E UCAC2 2001.255 269.6 14.39 7 M CMC14 2003.067 269.6 14.39 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2010.5 269.6 14.45 16 Qwi WISE WDS 08439-2521 8 43 55.87 -25 20 46.4 M 18.3 19.8 M4V DZ 1978.024 356.8 7.09 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1984.229 353.7 7.03 40 Gsc SuperCOSMOS ESO Schmidt red 1996.117 358.7 6.95 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt red WDS 08445-4200 8 44 29.20 -41 59 50.6 U 10.0 11.9 A0: 1900.499 346.1 11.67 13 G AC2000 1976.15 351.3 11.11 40 G Rousseau 1997.192 348.1 11.04 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 348.3 11.08 8 E UCAC2 2001.088 348.2 11.08 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 08460+8407 8 46 02.13 +84 06 55.1 T 9.5 12.0 F8 1900.141 129.2 7.17 13 G AC2000 1994.470 130.5 7.44 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2000.0 129.6 7.40 8 E UCAC3 WDS 08503+1057 Aa,Ab 8 50 19.15 +10 56 43.7 U 16.0 18.4 M5e M6e 1994.257 130.9 1.88 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 08588-6115 AB 8 58 48.59 -61 15 15.1 U 9.6 12.6 G8IV 1998.405 257.6 4.48 40 Ede DENIS 2000.011 257.4 4.81 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 08588-6115 AC 9.6 13.1 G8IV 1974.15 198.2 19.07 40 G Rousseau 1979.212 195.8 18.78 48 G GSC-ACT 1998.405 197.7 19.32 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 197.8 19.45 8 E UCAC2 2000.011 197.8 19.38 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 08590+1156 AB 8 59 02.64 +11 56 27.8 U 13.5 19.6 sdB3 1994.173 94.1 2.65 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1994.257 91.7 2.73 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 08590+1156 AC 13.5 19.5 sdB3 1994.173 296.0 3.61 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1994.257 297.0 3.64 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 08593-4730 8 59 19.85 -47 29 36.9 U 13.4 14.3 G2III 2000.0 40.3 2.10 8 E UCAC3 WDS 09000+2938 9 00 00.60 +29 38 02.7 M 15.1 15.4 G7 1998.887 61.5 5.06 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.16 62.4 4.95 8 E UCAC3 2001.266 62.6 4.94 7 M CMC14 2003.078 62.1 5.02 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2004.130 62.1 5.02 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09133-0219 AD 9 13 16.32 -02 18 44.2 U 11.6 11.6 K2V 2000.0 55.3 2.39 8 E UCAC3 WDS 09181-5746 9 18 08.88 -57 46 07.9 U 9.5 15.0 K7V 2000.016 137. 2.3 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 09280-6606 9 27 57.59 -66 06 08.3 U 8.9 16.0 K0.5V 2000.008 209.5 4.14 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 09287-0827 9 28 42.93 -08 27 23.9 U 10.5 16.1 K5V 1998.567 257.5 16.21 40 Ede DENIS 1999.047 256.9 16.02 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.945 257.2 16.28 7 M CMC14 WDS 09319+3430 BC 9 31 49.94 +34 30 47.3 U 12.3 18.7 F/G: K/M: 1953.940 172.4 18.31 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.225 171.6 18.40 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.087 172.0 18.38 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09452+4109 AB 9 45 13.06 +41 09 18.4 U 9.9 15.2 F0 2002.950 134.1 3.24 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09452+4109 AC 9.9 12.6 F0 1983.023 231.4 14.64 48 G GSC-ACT 1998.255 232.0 14.87 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 231.6 14.89 8 E UCAC2 2002.244 231.5 14.87 7 M CMC14 2002.950 231.6 14.77 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 09483-7345 9 48 20.61 -73 45 24.7 U 11.5 12.8 F3 1912.8 352.1 7.58 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1996.31 350.8 7.33 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.0 350.8 7.32 8 E UCAC2 2000.030 351.0 7.37 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 10086-7353 10 08 35.46 -73 53 23.0 U 11.4 13.1 F2 1911.4 72.9 17.44 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1976.255 73.2 17.32 48 G GSC-ACT 1999.079 72.8 17.48 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 72.7 17.49 8 E UCAC2 2000.030 72.9 17.51 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 73.0 17.45 16 Qwi WISE WDS 10117-6854 10 11 40.00 -68 54 12.6 U 11.1 11.6 F: 1911.867 188.3 14.61 13 G AC2000 1999.016 187.9 14.62 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 187.9 14.63 8 E UCAC2 2000.022 187.9 14.64 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 187.9 14.60 16 Qwi WISE WDS 10208+5836 AD 10 20 46.64 +58 36 23.3 T 9.6 16.0 G 1999.000 59.2 5.67 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.907 59.9 6.00 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 10208+5836 BE 10 20 45.83 +58 35 56.8 T 10.3 15.3 F: 1999.000 287.0 9.32 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 285.9 9.32 100 Esd UCAC3 minus SDSS DR7 2000.0 283.4 9.43 8 E UCAC3 WDS 10224-2851 10 22 23.49 -28 50 51.4 U 9.5 17.7 K3V 1998.249 149.5 15.00 40 Ede DENIS 1999.175 149.2 15.15 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 10317-3840 10 31 40.70 -38 40 21.7 U 10.7 10.7 K7V K7V 1909.760 357.3 8.16 13 G AC2000 1996.044 1.5 7.79 40 Ede DENIS 1999.260 2.1 7.74 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 0.9 7.78 8 E UCAC3 WDS 10366+7849 BC 10 36 43.23 +78 48 30.8 U 13.4 14.7 1994.569 0.5 2.45 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 10379+4407 BE 10 37 57.51 +44 07 13.6 S 12.3 15.0 2003.06 101.8 1.69 100 Esd SDSS DR7,n=2 WDS 11078-3421 11 07 47.90 -34 20 51.5 - 13.7 15.0 DA3.5 M4Ve 1978.185 107.4 30.51 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1986.119 107.4 30.54 40 Gsc SuperCOSMOS ESO Schmidt red 1992.314 107.1 30.49 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.197 107.2 30.62 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.307 107.4 30.59 40 Ede DENIS WDS 11104+8347 11 10 23.90 +83 46 34.2 T 10.2 12.4 F5 1900.278 158.4 27.38 13 G AC2000 1953.288 158.3 27.28 48 G USNO-A2.0 1984.10 158.3 27.61 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 2000.0 158.3 27.62 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 158.5 27.81 16 Qwi WISE WDS 11391-2742 11 39 08.16 -27 41 46.4 U 10.0 15.0 K7V 1998.518 26. 3.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 12178-3904 12 17 46.75 -39 04 05.0 U 11.2 14.0 M 1999.266 335.7 4.16 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 12208-1954 12 20 46.83 -19 53 45.8 U 9.0 14.0 K3V 1998.337 291.9 6.61 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 12208+2906 12 20 48.41 +29 06 04.9 M 16.5 17.0 G3 2000.003 50.3 4.60 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.214 48.1 4.56 7 M CMC14 2004.957 50.3 4.63 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12279+2931 12 27 56.09 +29 31 13.1 M 15.4 15.9 K3 2000.296 47.8 4.23 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.219 48.2 3.84 7 M CMC14 2001.39 47.2 4.15 8 E UCAC3 2004.957 48.0 4.27 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 12380+8328 12 38 01.65 +83 28 21.2 T 10.4 11.4 G8III G0: 1900.295 139.5 6.43 13 G AC2000 1930.3 138.6 6.10 6 G AGK2 1950.0 138.0 6.79 6 G AGK3 1999.331 138.8 5.91 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 138.7 6.01 8 E UCAC3 WDS 12556+2933 12 55 34.36 +29 32 32.7 M 14.7 15.0 G3 2000.260 179.4 4.60 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.41 180.2 4.67 8 E UCAC3 mean epoch 2004.390 179.9 4.64 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13016+2924 13 01 34.41 +29 23 48.3 M 13.4 14.3 F7 1982.384 144.3 8.73 48 G GSC-ACT 1993.288 144.0 8.79 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.074 143.9 8.80 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.219 143.8 8.76 7 M CMC14 2001.1 143.5 8.87 8 E UCAC3 mean epoch 2004.390 143.5 8.90 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13136+3013 13 13 33.55 +30 12 36.8 U 11.3 11.8 G1V G8 1902.972 281.3 123.40 13 G AC2000 1982.384 280.9 123.41 48 G GSC-ACT 1989.0 281.1 123.46 16 G FONAC mean epoch 2000.0 281.1 123.45 8 E UCAC2 2002.088 281.1 123.42 7 M CMC14 2004.392 281.1 123.41 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13352+5039 13 35 09.46 +50 39 16.8 M 12.9 14.7 M2: 2000.183 25.0 3.94 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 13375+1257 13 37 28.16 +12 56 51.3 U 9.4 12.0 F2 1907.3 326.5 9.96 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1998.49 327.0 9.96 8 M Bordeaux mean epoch 2000.0 327.0 10.15 8 E UCAC2 2001.186 327.0 10.07 7 M CMC14 2003.33 326.8 9.98 100 Esd SDSS DR7,n=2 WDS 13449-4535 13 44 55.12 -45 35 18.8 M 11.3 15.1 M: 1991.225 128.0 30.59 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.455 127.5 30.73 40 Ede DENIS 1999.394 127.8 30.72 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 127.4 30.80 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 127.6 30.72 16 Qwi WISE WDS 13457+0128 13 45 39.94 +01 27 45.0 U 10.5 15.0 K5V 1994.637 340.8 3.68 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2000.159 343.5 3.07 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.340 340.5 3.55 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 13472-4640 13 47 13.62 -46 39 48.5 U 11.6 12.1 F 1903.919 0.7 8.88 13 G AC2000 1996.386 0.3 9.16 40 Ede DENIS 1999.394 0.1 9.13 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 0.3 9.17 8 E UCAC2 WDS 14016+0133 AE 14 01 38.79 +01 32 40.3 T 4.3 15.4 A3V 1999.509 174.1 14.60 40 Ede DENIS 2000.3 174.8 14.93 100 Esd 2MASS minus SDSS DR7 WDS 14201-1104 14 20 08.15 -11 03 30.3 U 10.1 17.1 K3V 1999.186 241.1 14.16 51 E2m 2MASS 2002.444 240.4 13.98 7 M CMC14 WDS 14232-0807 14 23 11.54 -08 06 58.6 U 9.9 18.0 K5V 1999.186 310.5 9.11 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.493 310.5 8.69 40 Ede DENIS WDS 14389-4310 14 38 54.41 -43 10 22.2 U 11.1 16.6 K3Ve 1980.817 35.6 30.69 48 G USNO-A2.0 1998.465 35.7 30.21 40 Ede DENIS 1999.383 35.6 30.31 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 35.3 30.05 8 E UCAC3 2010.5 35.5 30.34 16 Qwi WISE WDS 15003-1632 15 00 19.96 -16 32 28.4 U 9.8 15.0 K2V 1998.307 307.3 4.31 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 15091+5904 15 09 08.09 +59 04 25.9 M 12.9 16.5 M2.5 M4 1994.635 285.1 8.98 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1995.155 285.3 8.78 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.277 285.1 8.99 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.143 284.2 9.05 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2003.26 284.5 9.07 8 E UCAC3 WDS 15158-2609 15 15 48.90 -26 08 46.1 U 13.0 13.9 A5 1976.40 174.7 14.63 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1991.288 174.7 14.73 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.783 174.4 14.84 40 Ede DENIS 1999.236 174.1 14.90 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 174.3 14.89 8 E UCAC2 2003.285 174.4 14.89 7 M CMC14 2010.5 174.3 14.94 16 Qwi WISE WDS 15265-0115 15 26 31.77 -01 15 12.2 U 10.7 16.0 K5V 1999.218 232.7 3.87 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2001.454 231.2 3.73 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 15445+4910 15 44 29.22 +49 10 28.5 M 15.5 15.5 M6/7 2001.392 28.4 1.46 100 Esd SDSS DR8 WDS 15468-0515 15 46 50.78 -05 15 23.5 U 10.2 16.0 K2V 1999.153 157.0 11.94 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.375 156.5 11.92 40 Ede DENIS 2003.457 157.0 11.98 7 M CMC14 WDS 16037-5402 AB 16 03 42.08 -54 02 00.6 U 10.9 13.0 WR 2000.145 358.1 4.36 51 E2m 2MASS 2004.5 357.6 4.47 32 T GLIMPSE-I 2007.2 357.6 4.49 32 T GLIMPSE-3D WDS 16037-5402 AC 10.9 12.5 WR 1897.570 224.0 7.08 13 G Fresneau et al 1927.70 225.2 6.99 13 G Fresneau et al 1999.32 234.7 7.04 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 2000.0 234.9 7.13 8 E UCAC3 2000.145 232.5 7.07 51 E2m 2MASS 2007.2 234.7 7.29 32 T GLIMPSE-3D WDS 16127-1319 16 12 41.93 -13 18 56.3 U 11.0 15.3 K3V 1999.301 130.0 8.63 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.392 130.2 8.65 40 Ede DENIS 2002.452 130.6 8.58 7 M CMC14 WDS 16470-7727 16 46 59.68 -77 26 57.2 M 11.7 12.1 F: 1894.287 359.1 4.78 13 G AC2000 1996.323 357.8 5.64 40 Ede DENIS 1998.775 357.8 5.61 40 Ede DENIS 2000.296 357.7 5.66 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 16496-5841 16 49 38.20 -58 40 57.0 M 14.9 15.9 K/M 1999.575 25. 1.2 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 16573-6155 16 57 20.18 -61 54 49.2 M 15.1 17.6 M: 1976.629 4.6 11.95 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1993.247 4.6 12.03 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.298 4.7 12.07 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 4.7 12.12 16 Qwi WISE WDS 17058-6325 17 05 46.06 -63 25 14.4 M 15.9 17.9 K: 2000.342 165. 2.7 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 17104+2759 17 10 25.46 +27 58 40.1 M 12.6 17.7 M2: M5.5V 1950.383 128.9 48.12 48 G USNO-A2.0 1991.378 128.8 48.18 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS POSS-II blue 1993.455 128.8 48.20 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.424 128.9 47.99 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.348 128.8 48.11 7 M CMC14 2001.378 128.8 48.11 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2002.438 128.9 48.12 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2004.709 128.6 48.29 100 Esd SDSS DR7 2010.5 128.8 48.08 16 Qwi WISE WDS 17181-0117 17 18 04.96 -01 17 06.0 U 9.5 15.2 K3V 1999.227 165.0 9.23 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.320 164.5 8.91 40 Ede DENIS WDS 17193-2949 17 19 20.33 -29 49 23.3 M 14.1 14.6 M: 1997.321 316.4 11.82 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.526 316.4 11.80 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.821 316.6 11.79 40 Ede DENIS 2002.591 316.5 11.80 7 M CMC14 WDS 17203-3012 17 20 18.12 -30 11 44.8 M 14.7 17.6 M: 1997.321 150.4 7.43 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.605 150.3 7.77 51 E2m 2MASS 1998.824 152.6 7.61 40 Ede DENIS 1999.553 152.1 7.61 40 Ede DENIS WDS 17349+8313 17 34 51.57 +83 12 40.4 U 11.6 11.9 F5 1899.432 182.5 7.03 13 G AC2000 1999.438 182.8 6.96 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 182.6 6.99 8 E UCAC3 WDS 17375-6634 AB 17 37 32.36 -66 34 23.8 M 11.6 11.6 M 2000.0 49.8 2.12 8 E UCAC3 WDS 17375-6634 AC 11.6 14.5 1978.577 351.3 70.58 48 G GSC-ACT 1996.612 351.4 70.27 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.329 351.6 70.55 40 Ede DENIS 2000.345 351.5 70.51 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 17532-4650 17 53 11.56 -46 49 46.1 U 12.6 12.6 G: 1905.302 359.2 11.46 13 G AC2000 1987.298 0.0 10.98 48 G GSC-ACT 1996.680 359.9 11.21 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.550 0.0 11.27 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.633 0.2 11.28 40 Ede DENIS 2000.0 0.0 11.25 8 E UCAC2 2010.5 0.0 11.28 16 Qwi WISE WDS 18346-3338 18 34 37.48 -33 37 42.5 U 11.8 11.8 F: 1912.929 359.0 13.26 13 G AC2000 1987.377 359.5 13.28 48 G GSC-ACT 2000.0 359.1 13.56 8 E UCAC2 2000.583 359.2 13.56 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 358.9 13.39 16 Qwi WISE WDS 18391-6523 18 39 03.83 -65 23 04.5 M 10.6 15.5 K: 1996.641 70.7 6.89 40 Ede DENIS 1998.619 70.6 6.61 40 Ede DENIS 2000.405 69.8 6.84 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 18437-0413 18 43 42.17 -04 12 42.2 U 10.0 13.2 G2V 1999.315 23.0 14.73 40 Ede DENIS 1999.364 23.1 14.82 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 22.8 14.77 8 E UCAC3 2003.110 22.7 14.94 7 M CMC14 2007.2 23.2 14.95 32 T GLIMPSE-3D WDS 18493-5354 18 49 16.16 -53 53 52.6 M 15.5 16.5 K: 1991.668 269.9 8.54 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.649 268.8 8.42 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 18569-2910 18 56 55.08 -29 10 22.0 U 11.7 11.8 F 1913.641 359.6 8.13 13 G AC2000 1998.485 359.3 8.07 40 Ede DENIS 1998.526 359.6 8.02 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 359.3 8.06 8 E UCAC2 2003.487 359.3 8.04 7 M CMC14 WDS 18576-6321 18 57 33.23 -63 21 02.3 M 14.6 17.7 M: 1979.889 8.4 24.49 48 G USNO-A2.0 1995.655 8.2 24.54 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.780 8.7 24.50 40 Ede DENIS 2000.405 8.6 24.52 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 18596-5529 18 59 33.46 -55 29 09.5 - 18.0 19.0 WD? WD? 1991.668 105.0 7.18 48 G GSC-2.3 WDS 19015-5840 19 01 29.93 -58 40 02.0 M 14.8 18.2 M: M: 1989.658 17.1 21.26 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.348 18.2 21.34 40 Ede DENIS 1999.819 18.2 21.34 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 16.5 21.25 48 G USNO-B1.0 2010.5 17.8 21.50 16 Qwi WISE WDS 19150-6239 19 15 00.56 -62 38 35.1 M 15.5 17.5 K/M 1996.654 136.0 5.87 40 Ede DENIS 2000.764 136.2 5.86 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 19459-3521 19 45 54.22 -35 20 43.1 M 11.0 11.0 K 1913.680 356.5 5.38 13 G AC2000 2000.602 350.0 5.50 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 19578-2132 AC 19 57 47.63 -21 31 36.4 U 10.8 16.0 K3V 1999.512 330. 3.5 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 20031-0617 20 03 05.27 -06 17 16.9 U 9.6 16.0 K5V 1999.370 170. 4.7 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 20126-0904 20 12 37.86 -09 04 07.9 U 10.6 14.3 K7V 1999.578 40.7 8.50 51 E2m 2MASS 2003.288 39.4 8.43 7 M CMC14,n=4 WDS 20162+5126 20 16 13.82 +51 25 49.5 T 10.0 11.0 F8 1900.249 25.0 26.13 13 G AC2000 1983.48 25.1 25.96 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 2000.0 27.4 26.11 8 E UCAC3 2000.361 28.9 26.11 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 20217-5000 20 21 41.04 -49 59 57.8 T 6.3 12.8 F9V 1975.53 299.0 21.56 40 G Rousseau 1999.783 299.4 21.27 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 300.2 21.27 16 Qwi WISE WDS 20283-5519 20 28 20.05 -55 19 23.6 M 14.8 16.8 K/M 2000.786 332. 1.8 51 E2m 2MASS estimate WDS 20384+5248 AB 20 38 24.75 +52 48 04.8 U 10.5 11.7 F5 1952.710 179.0 19.16 48 G USNO-A2.0 1983.516 178.6 19.79 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1991.25 178.8 19.99 11 T Tycho-2 epoch 2000.0 178.6 19.96 8 E UCAC3 2000.430 178.5 19.93 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 20452-6902 20 45 14.92 -69 01 52.8 M 15.5 15.7 M: 1976.701 244.8 41.91 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1993.690 244.9 41.97 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.567 244.8 42.02 40 Ede DENIS 2000.430 245.2 41.85 51 E2m 2MASS 2010.5 244.8 41.97 16 Qwi WISE WDS 21011-4907 21 01 07.42 -49 07 24.9 M 13.3 15.8 M3.5 1977.539 340.1 64.73 48 Gsc SuperCOSMOS UK Schmidt blue 1992.568 340.3 64.49 48 G GSC-2.3 1999.646 340.3 64.43 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.753 340.3 64.43 40 Ede DENIS 2000.690 340.4 64.45 40 Ede DENIS 2010.5 340.4 64.49 16 Qwi WISE WDS 21014-5019 21 01 21.06 -50 18 49.2 M 13.6 13.9 M: 1977.541 157.6 12.86 48 G GSC-ACT 1998.68 157.9 12.80 8 E UCAC3 1999.646 158.0 12.83 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.753 157.8 12.84 40 Ede DENIS 2000.772 157.9 12.84 40 Ede DENIS 2010.5 158.0 12.83 16 Qwi WISE WDS 21144+5015 21 14 21.63 +50 14 52.5 U 9.4 10.2 A0V A2 1903.1 205.6 44.44 13 G AC2000 mean epoch 1983.451 205.9 44.40 48 G GSC-ACT 2000.0 206.1 44.36 8 E UCAC3 WDS 21178+5229 21 17 50.98 +52 28 33.1 T 7.7 11.1 F2 1900.925 304.9 55.36 13 G AC2000 1991.25 305.2 55.83 11 T Tycho-2 1994.651 304.7 56.17 100 Esd SDSS DR7 1998.860 305.4 55.89 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 305.3 55.90 8 E UCAC3 WDS 21200+5436 AB 21 19 58.57 +54 35 33.1 T 10.3 10.5 G0: F5: 1902.371 298.2 31.69 13 G AC2000 1983.516 298.6 31.44 48 G GSC-ACT,n=2 1984.59 298.2 31.15 16 G FONAC 1999.474 298.5 31.59 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 298.6 31.58 8 E UCAC3 WDS 21235+8417 21 23 32.60 +84 16 59.6 T 11.6 12.7 G5 1899.125 151.2 3.90 13 G AC2000 1998.720 193.8 3.55 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 193.0 3.52 8 E UCAC3 WDS 21394+5255 21 39 24.27 +52 55 12.7 T 10.8 11.0 A5 1901.875 267.4 13.93 13 G AC2000 2000.0 266.3 13.88 8 E UCAC3 2000.449 266.2 13.86 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 21403+0516 21 40 15.46 +05 16 25.9 U 13.7 17.1 M4:V 1953.781 22.9 14.87 48 G USNO-A2.0 1995.568 23.4 14.90 48 G GSC-2.3 2000.537 22.8 14.88 51 E2m 2MASS 2001.701 23.2 14.94 7 M CMC14 2005.736 22.9 14.97 100 Esd SDSS DR7 WDS 21473-4034 21 47 16.46 -40 34 03.7 M 12.8 14.3 M: 1998.72 247.5 7.84 8 E UCAC3 1999.507 247.0 7.58 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.745 247.3 7.64 40 Ede DENIS WDS 21519-4325 21 51 52.05 -43 24 33.0 M 15.5 15.5 M: 1998.753 31.6 5.55 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 1999.717 32.1 5.66 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 21573-3418 AC 21 57 17.20 -34 18 21.4 U 10.5 16.2 K5V 1975.74 153.6 13.05 40 G Rousseau 1976.635 155.2 13.01 48 G GSC-ACT 1998.531 153.7 13.54 40 Ede DENIS 1999.687 153.4 13.59 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 153.4 13.65 8 E UCAC3 WDS 22020-4955 22 01 58.14 -49 55 12.8 M 13.8 14.7 K: 1999.715 222.6 4.10 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.561 227.3 3.82 40 Ede DENIS WDS 22199-3717 22 19 52.59 -37 16 31.5 U 10.2 16.0 K5V 1998.682 330.6 4.53 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 22320-4515 22 31 58.32 -45 15 14.5 M 15.0 16.5 M: 1990.781 177.9 6.11 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.895 178.7 6.12 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 22374-4550 22 37 22.21 -45 50 10.1 U 10.1 14.8 K3V 1974.63 350.9 7.51 40 G Rousseau, uncertain 1998.898 349.2 6.99 51 E2m 2MASS 1999.54 349.2 6.98 40 Ede DENIS,n=2 WDS 23097-4223 23 09 39.46 -42 22 51.3 M 10.8 15.2 K0 1998.745 114.4 9.43 40 Ede DENIS 1999.706 115.1 9.29 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23105-4109 23 10 32.01 -41 09 15.4 M 13.2 15.7 K: 1998.745 89.8 8.72 40 Ede DENIS 1999.600 85.4 8.73 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23176-4212 23 17 38.02 -42 11 30.0 U 10.4 14.4 K6V 1999.706 173.2 10.91 51 E2m 2MASS WDS 23289-5428 23 28 52.43 -54 27 59.6 M 14.3 16.0 K/M 1996.616 129.4 15.92 40 Ede DENIS 1999.852 129.2 15.86 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 129.1 15.87 8 E UCAC3 WDS 23460-5621 23 45 57.69 -56 20 40.8 M 14.4 14.6 M: 1991.852 277.6 8.57 48 G GSC-2.3 1998.652 277.6 8.22 40 Ede DENIS 1999.862 277.6 8.29 51 E2m 2MASS 2000.0 277.6 8.25 8 E UCAC3 WDS 23553-3155 23 55 16.59 -31 55 17.3 T 6.1 6.8 B6V B8V 1751.89 4.8 132.5 0.5 I Lacaille 1874.3 0.6 133.51 5 M AGC 1911.299 0.5 134.02 13 G AC2000 1967.1 0.7 133.69 8 G CPC2 1977.34 0.6 133.95 40 G Rousseau 1991.25 0.6 133.91 11 T Tycho-2 1991.4 0.6 133.61 7 M CMC11 2000.559 0.6 133.92 51 E2m 2MASS 2007.0 0.4 133.56 27 T AKARI